this post was submitted on 26 Dec 2024
110 points (98.2% liked)

World News

39390 readers
2384 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Jinjiang Group, a BYD contractor, denied Brazilian authorities’ claims that 163 Chinese workers were in “slavery-like conditions” at a Brazilian factory.

Jinjiang claimed translation misunderstandings and cultural differences, stating workers voluntarily handed over passports.

BYD, distancing itself from the issue, cut ties with the contractor and is cooperating with authorities. China’s foreign ministry is also investigating.

The factory is central to BYD’s expansion in Brazil, its largest overseas market, with production set to begin in 2024 or 2025.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (2 children)

When I used to work in china the folks I worked with worked 6 days a week. Their view of what slavery is is much worse than ours because they themselves are prisoners (more so than us in the US at least, and dramatically more than those in Europe)

[–] hmancuso@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Regardless of the company's biases about what slavery means, once they decide to operate in another country, those biases do not apply. That's called legal compliance. They can say whatever they want, but in the end it comes down to a simple question: is that legal in Brazil?

[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

Totally agree. I’m not defending the company/china in any way, was just commenting from my experience working over there

[–] hmancuso@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago

I know. Just wanted to make a point that regardless of a company's geopolitical background, they must abide to local legislation. Also, I'm aware of the working conditions in Chinese companies. Your perspective, based on your work experience, adds an insightful view of of labor relations in China. Thanks for your comment.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk -1 points 20 hours ago

It's not slavery unless you're beaten within an inch of your life?