this post was submitted on 26 Dec 2024
115 points (98.3% liked)

World News

39390 readers
3173 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Jinjiang Group, a BYD contractor, denied Brazilian authorities’ claims that 163 Chinese workers were in “slavery-like conditions” at a Brazilian factory.

Jinjiang claimed translation misunderstandings and cultural differences, stating workers voluntarily handed over passports.

BYD, distancing itself from the issue, cut ties with the contractor and is cooperating with authorities. China’s foreign ministry is also investigating.

The factory is central to BYD’s expansion in Brazil, its largest overseas market, with production set to begin in 2024 or 2025.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Alterforlett@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The letter said, for instance, that 107 workers had handed their passports to the company for help with applying for a temporary ID certificate in Brazil. The Brazilian labor inspectors had said that the workers had had their passports withheld by the company.

As someone who works in different countries, I sometimes have to send in my passport for stamps, verification, visa applications etc. What i always have on me is my secondary passport, for obvious reasons. I don't buy for a second that a company this size wouldn't make sure that their workers had a secondary passport, unless they had ulterior motives. It also makes everything else they say suspect.

[–] xep@fedia.io 8 points 1 day ago

Making the oppressed say they aren't is unfortunately standard practice for China, so I agree, take anything the workers say with a grain of salt.

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I sometimes have to send in my passport for stamps, verification, visa applications etc

I imagine you do that while you are on your home country.

Collecting passports from people away from their country is a huge "no, you don't" thing. But from people in their own country is no big deal.

Collecting passports from people away from their country is a huge “no, you don’t” thing.

Not really, in many cases it's a necessity.

That's not to say that giving your passport to your employer for safe keeping is a good idea.

[–] Alterforlett@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago

Not so. We have agencies who bring our passports to the offices that require them.