this post was submitted on 18 Dec 2024
471 points (98.4% liked)

News

23661 readers
3442 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

At the first meeting of the DOGE Caucus, a new congressional group focused on government efficiency, Republican Rep. Greg Lopez stated that cuts to Social Security and Medicare are likely “on the table” as part of debt reduction efforts.

The caucus, led by Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy, aims to slash government spending, raising concerns among advocacy groups about potential attacks on anti-poverty programs.

Critics, including Social Security Works, warn the caucus may push for privatization and benefit reductions.

This comes despite Trump’s prior commitment to protect these programs.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CitricBase@lemmy.world 233 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Friendly reminder that Social Security is a separate government program that funds itself.

What Musk is talking about is stealing from Social Security in order to cut taxes elsewhere (namely cutting taxes for people like Musk).

[–] n2burns@lemmy.ca 53 points 1 week ago (2 children)

That's not completely true. Social Security is supposed to fund itself, however it's currently facing a funding shortfall with current estimates that it will be depleted in 2035. There are many suggestions on how make this program solvent, including bolstering it with general funds.

[–] CitricBase@lemmy.world 119 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think a good start would be to stop allowing Republicans to raid Social Security for quick cash, like they've been constantly doing since the Reagan administration.

[–] teamevil@lemmy.world 55 points 1 week ago

But then how could they argue it's insolvent‽

[–] Dkarma@lemmy.world 45 points 1 week ago

That's not completely true. Long ago they put it into the general fund. There is always a shortfall in the general fund. Before they put it in there it was solvent, and if they wouldn't have it would be completely solvent today.

It was already stolen. They want the rest.

[–] Maestro@fedia.io 7 points 1 week ago (4 children)

How does it fund itself? What's the income? Just Social Security Tax?

[–] CitricBase@lemmy.world 84 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Yes, it's a payroll tax. Your paycheck may show how much you are paying into Social Security. This is money meant to help you and others after retirement. Musk wants to take that money and instead use it to fill unrelated gaps in the federal budget, gaps caused by Trump's tax cuts for the very wealthy.

[–] PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works 33 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Holy shit I never realized it until you explained it like this. Thank you, and also we are fucked.

[–] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

This is one of the rare cases where I want to laugh at the silly US, but can't because our "scial security" (we call it "retirement savings") is being missapropriated for general funds as well :(

I just this year set up regular investment (part of my paycheck) into various funds to save for retirement privately.

[–] Supervisor194@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I just this year set up regular investment (part of my paycheck) into various funds to save for retirement privately.

Social Security got the structure it has after the Great Depression wiped... well, you know. Everyone. Out.

I'm sure your private equity will be run much more responsibly throughout your life though, no need for some big ol' stupid government to guarantee your retirement or anything. Carry on!

[–] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

no need for some big ol' stupid government to guarantee your retirement or anything.

I still have the government guaranteed pension as well, not as if I could opt out even if I wanted to, which I don't.

The concept of the day: Diversification!

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 week ago

Social Security is more than just retirement.

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago

We are only fucked if we let it happen.

[–] pound_heap@lemm.ee 5 points 1 week ago

Social Security fund invested in government bonds, so the interest from that goes into the fund.

To be fair the budget deficit was there before Trump. His campaign promises are going to increase it, but they can offset that partially with spending cuts. Also, the government has been using money from the Social Security fund routinely, again nothing new under Trump. They just count it as an internal debt. According to Wikipedia, by 2022 it's been already about 20% of the fund "borrowed" by the government.

[–] jacksilver@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

Another thing about the tax is that there is a cap on the amount you pay into it https://money.usnews.com/money/retirement/social-security/articles/what-is-the-social-security-tax-limit. Meaning it's a regressive tax where lower income people pay more than wealthy people (not to mention that many wealthy people may not have traditional income and pay no taxes for this).

[–] Bronzebeard@lemm.ee 3 points 1 week ago

It doesn't fund itself, but it's a completely separate fund [bucket of money] than the rest of the government budget, with a specific tax that goes directly to it and nothing else.

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

That's exactly his plan. So how are we going to stop him?

[–] deaf_fish@lemm.ee 5 points 1 week ago

Right now, it is looking like we have missed our chance to do much about it. The only other options on the table are pretty grim.

[–] 4grams@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

We had our chance a little over a month ago. Now our only hope is their own incompetence.