this post was submitted on 18 Dec 2024
176 points (99.4% liked)

Green Energy

2283 readers
18 users here now

Everything about energy production and storage.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] YarHarSuperstar@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (3 children)

That seems like a bad idea unless we figure out a good way to fix the albedo problem that is apparently worse than ever

[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-022-31558-z

The albedo decease from urbanization in 2018 relative to 2001 has yielded a 100-year average annual global warming of 0.00014 [0.00008, 0.00021] °C. Without proper mitigation, future urbanization in 2050 relative to 2018 and that in 2100 relative to 2018 under the intermediate emission scenario (SSP2-4.5) would yield a 100-year average warming effect of 0.00107 [0.00057,0.00179] °C and 0.00152 [0.00078,0.00259] °C, respectively, through altering the Earth’s albedo.

The albedo does have an effect, but not much of one. If we were to supplement every household with the ~30% solar power this article suggests, it would be a massive improvement and far outweigh the costs of the albedo.

[–] Infynis@midwest.social 8 points 1 week ago

They're saying to cover the stuff that's already there, not to build new solar cities

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago

albedo problem

Especially when you consider looking at the average city from above .... the surface is almost 70 to 80% either asphalt or concrete. The average city is literally just a giant solar heat collector. If we didn't do anything about solar panels ... it would be just as efficient if we figured out how to just heat water and use the steam power instead.