this post was submitted on 13 Dec 2024
331 points (98.3% liked)

World News

39380 readers
2998 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Leading scientists, including Nobel laureates, are urging a halt to research on creating “mirror life” microbes, citing “unprecedented risks” to life on Earth.

Mirror microbes, built from reversed molecular structures, could evade natural immune systems, leading to uncontrollable lethal infections.

While mirror molecules hold potential for medical and industrial uses, researchers warn that mirror organisms could escape containment and resist antibiotics.

A 299-page report in Science advocates banning such research until safety can be ensured and calls for global debate on its ethical and ecological implications.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Yeah, knowing how fucky simple protein molecules can get when you flip the chirality (prions, which are essentially the root cause of Alzheimer’s and CJD and a few other neurodegenerative conditions), making whole-ass microbes on that principle without understanding what that could even mean sounds like a WILDLY insane idea.

[–] originalfrozenbanana@lemm.ee 37 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Not to nit but we absolutely do not know the root cause of Alzheimer’s disease. Not that prions are good or anything.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah, sorry, didn’t mean to imply that’s all that is going on with Alzheimer’s, but I was under the impression that prion formation/presence in neurological tissue was extremely highly correlated with the condition, though the precise mechanism of their effects aren’t yet well understood. Then again, I haven’t seriously looked into that stuff since my grandfather passed from it a while ago.

[–] batmaniam@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Sorry about your grandfather. There's probably more than one mechanism for alzeimers (not an expert), but amaloyid plaque formation, which is definitely A way to develop alzheimer's, is indeed a prion like event. I'm not sure if "prion" has some hyper-precise definition but the ideas similar: you get one amalyoid protein that misfolds, and acts as a nucleation site misfolding and agglomerating others.

[–] SARGE@startrek.website 14 points 1 week ago (2 children)

As always, some people see Jurassic Park as inspiration and wonder why nobody gave Hammond a chance.

The rest of us know that Dr. Malcolm was right from the start.

[–] Bronzebeard@lemm.ee 22 points 1 week ago (3 children)

To be fair, whoever designed that park was a moron.

[–] ramble81@lemm.ee 18 points 1 week ago (2 children)

That’s what you get when you treat your IT like crap and only hire one person.

[–] Bronzebeard@lemm.ee 7 points 1 week ago

Newman didn't built the park though. If you require power for the park to not fall apart immediately, you've already lost.

Remember that whole movie happens in one night. T rexes breaking confinement the moment the fence isn't electrified means some engineer fucked up big time.

[–] NeatoBuilds@mander.xyz 2 points 1 week ago

I mean IT people just sit around all day on the computer anyway

[–] batmaniam@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Ok. THANK YOU. I also have to say my biggest issue with the newer one (I forget which) is when the parks going to hell, and the park director just decides to go off into the jungle. Like outside of just design of the park, there is NO way you don't have rigid protocols in-place. Like you read about half the crap Disney does/can do at their parks... there's no way the head of the park just goes "oh you guys got this, I'll be back at some point, just do your best".

Like if ONLY for the reason it would be a known PR disaster for something that in universe already had PR disasters... that shit would have been drilled in since day -1000. It's my biggest issue with the writing because it's not even sci-fi.

/end rant.

[–] Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yeah, people in real life won't be morons, so that would never happen to us. I'm sure the company giving us the lowest bid has probably found some heretofore unknown innovation in efficiency. The end result will be just as good, but way cheaper...

[–] grue@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Jurassic Park at least makes sense because dinosaurs are cool.

Opposite-chirality microbes, though? Nobody asked for that.

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 week ago

Prions aren't a chirality issue, they're a folding issue

[–] AmidFuror@fedia.io 6 points 1 week ago

Prions are comprised of right-handed amino acids. I don't think it's the same thing to flip the chirality of a molecule as to flip the chirality of its subcomponents. DNA is usually right-handed, but there are left-handed forms created naturally. They don't suddenly annihilate their counterparts in antimatter-like collisions.

There are natural pharmaceuticals that consist of both chiralities, and obviously plenty of synthetic ones.

It's really not that simple. If we want to think about it longer, fine by me. But what is the real threat level?

Edit: As others have pointed out, prions also aren't an example of a different chirality of the native protein. The issue with prions is they can convert the native protein to their form, which "reproduces" themselves to make the disease progress. Mirrored organisms will propagate the chirality of their components, but their components don't inherently convert their enantiomers once that organism is dead.