this post was submitted on 09 Dec 2024
281 points (85.9% liked)

No Stupid Questions

36188 readers
1787 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Reason I'm asking is because I have an aunt that owns like maybe 3 - 5 (not sure the exact amount) small townhouses around the city (well, when I say "city" think of like the areas around a city where theres no tall buildings, but only small 2-3 stories single family homes in the neighborhood) and have these houses up for rent, and honestly, my aunt and her husband doesn't seem like a terrible people. They still work a normal job, and have to pay taxes like everyone else have to. They still have their own debts to pay. I'm not sure exactly how, but my parents say they did a combination of saving up money and taking loans from banks to be able to buy these properties, fix them, then put them up for rent. They don't overcharge, and usually charge slightly below the market to retain tenants, and fix things (or hire people to fix things) when their tenants request them.

I mean, they are just trying to survive in this capitalistic world. They wanna save up for retirement, and fund their kids to college, and leave something for their kids, so they have less of stress in life. I don't see them as bad people. I mean, its not like they own multiple apartment buildings, or doing excessive wealth hoarding.

Do leftists mean people like my aunt too? Or are they an exception to the "landlords are bad" sentinment?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 28 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

If you make a profit for allowing another person shelter (particularly if you don't need that space for yourself and/or your own family), then you are a parasite.

[–] uranibaba@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

A bit of a hyperbole, but for the sake of this discussion, let's say there is a house and no one can afford it but me. If I don't buy it and rent it, no one can live in it. What would be the right thing to do?

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 24 points 2 weeks ago

The market determines the price. If no one can afford it the price is too high.

[–] TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee 23 points 2 weeks ago

Reduce the price of the house

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

I take umbrage with the hypothetical itself. Do you believe that buying the property and renting it out is the only possible solution here?

The "right thing" would be to not have a situation like that in the first place where only one person (or one small group of people) can afford to own the roof over their head.

But, obviously, an option you're neglecting here, is letting people live in the property without paying rent. Nobody is forcing you to make a profit off people's basic needs for survival.

[–] Glitterbomb@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Nobody is forcing you

No, but if they don't, someone else will.

This is supposed to be where the law/govt steps in so nobody CAN profit off of basic needs like this. Just like Healthcare, we can have a mountain of limp CEOs and still nothing will have changed until the law changes.

But maybe I'm wrong, maybe we should let The Adjuster do his job and see what happens. I hope property management CEOs realize they're the #2 spot underneath health insurance.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Bro, who here is talking about CEOs and "The Adjuster" (cringe)?

No, but if they don't, someone else will.

Not really... In the hypothetical (and in real life), nothing is stopping anyone from buying the property and allowing people to stay free of charge.

[–] chilicheeselies@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago

If you didnt buy it in this scenario, then market pressure eventually pushes the proce down until someone is willing (and able) to buy it.