this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2024
740 points (91.4% liked)

Showerthoughts

30038 readers
452 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. A showerthought should offer a unique perspective on an ordinary part of life.

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. Avoid politics
    • 3.1) NEW RULE as of 5 Nov 2024, trying it out
    • 3.2) Political posts often end up being circle jerks (not offering unique perspective) or enflaming (too much work for mods).
    • 3.3) Try c/politicaldiscussion, volunteer as a mod here, or start your own community.
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It appears that in every thread about this event there is someone calling everyone else in the thread sick and twisted for not proclaiming that all lives are sacred and being for the death of one individual.

It really is a real life trolley problem because those individuals are not seeing the deaths caused by the insurance industry and not realizing that sitting back and doing nothing (i.e. not pulling the lever on the train track switch) doesn't save lives...people are going to continue to die if nothing is done.

Taking a moral high ground and stating that all lives matter is still going to costs lives and instead of it being a few CEOs it will be thousands.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] voracitude@lemmy.world 37 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

If it was a random death you might have a point. I would still say it makes sense that people would celebrate the death of a villain, but that's beside the point.

This was an assassination, a message on its own even if there weren't literal words carved into the casings. This may well give a person about to make an inhumane decision on behalf of a company's bottom line pause. It's a reminder that those decisions have real consequences, even if not always legal ones.

[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

They'll pause to call up more private security to keep themselves safe while they raise your premiums even more.

A Christmas Carol was just a story, not reality. You're not going to scare CEOs into doing the right thing, especially not with threat of death.

[–] voracitude@lemmy.world 15 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Maybe. You seem to be very certain about how each of these individuals thinks, which is not a level of confidence I often reach with my own opinions.

[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 5 points 2 weeks ago

More private security means more people in their vicinity with guns. Hope none of those people has a loved one murdered by these assholes. Statistically that seems unlikely, and finding good security will get harder if demand spikes that much.

[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 weeks ago

Would their security have good insurance? Cause otherwise that’s another potential gunner.

The rich are far more of a coward than your giving them credit to be. They are only so evil because of the lack of consequences, not in spite of.

[–] jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 2 weeks ago

yes, which is why threats that are backed up with actions are far more persuasive.

[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Lmao, you honestly think any executive heard any message other than 'i need to spend more on corporate security and body guards'?

[–] LesserAbe@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Yes, I do. Sure they'll do that, but I think they'll have a tiny bit of second guessing. Would certainly be more impactful if this was a trend rather than one off.