Asklemmy

44173 readers

2563 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

Can anyone help me understand why Hasan Piker is so popular in leftist political spaces despite his immense privilege? (lemmy.world)

submitted 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) by extremeboredom@lemmy.world to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

148 comments fedilink hide all child comments

This guy's dad is the former VP of a multibillion dollar Turkish conglomerate, as well as the secretary of a government department. Mom and Dad were able to fly to their other home in NJ to give birth so he'd get US citizenship. His uncle is the founder and owner of TYT Media and gave him his media career. He went to Rutgers. He lives in a multimillion dollar mansion in the Hollywood Hills. This is by definition not the kind of person who can be a voice of the People. Saying "I recognize my privilege" over and over, while living his lifestyle, doesn't negate his privilege and complete lack of real-life experience outside of the curated garden of the wealthy. He gets paid obscene amounts of cash to sit in his bedroom and word-vomit for 9 hours a day. Why are his unending opinions taken so seriously? He gives me strong controlled opposition vibes.

Edit: Thank you all for this discussion. I learned a lot.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] chunkystyles@sopuli.xyz 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

This is very dismissive of the other commenters you've responded to who also appear to have understood you quite well. The difference is just that you like this one better.

You rail against someone for their privileges, but can't seem to see past your own biases. We all have biases. It's important to be able to recognize them and try to see past them. Including against privileged allies.

[–] extremeboredom@lemmy.world -1 points 3 weeks ago

"One of" the only ones, not "the" only one. The difference is exactly what I stated, the respondant clearly understood my question. Would you like me to edit each of my other replies, to acknowledge the ones who also understood my question, for consistency's sake? I should probably then reply to each of the ones who didn't understand my question, to make sure and point it out, right? Otherwise I'm being very dismissive?

I've been learning from this discussion, so I'm not sure why you think I'm incapable of seeing my biases.

Here's a question: Is it cool to hoard wealth if you're saying leftist-sounding stuff while you do it?