this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2024
903 points (99.3% liked)

politics

19246 readers
3633 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Donald Trump has exempted himself from key ethics guidelines required under the Presidential Transition Act, which he signed into law in 2020.

By rejecting federal funding for his transition team, Trump avoids donor limits and disclosure requirements, raising concerns about conflicts of interest and transparency.

Critics, including Senator Elizabeth Warren and government watchdogs, warn that Trump’s refusal to submit an ethics plan undermines accountability and could open the door to corruption.

This move marks a break from precedent and has sparked alarm over potential personal enrichment during his presidency.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 91 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It's funny how Brazil (a country that's seen the consequences of authoritarianism) is handling their own attempted coup vs the U.S., we are basically welcoming Trump back after everything he's done.

After the coup attempt he should have been barred from office and arrested. This is such a ridiculous timeline.

[–] skeezix@lemmy.world 20 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Societies get the leaders they deserve.

[–] LANIK2000@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago

I hate that sentiment and especially wording, but there is sadly truth behind it...

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I guess... he barely won the popular vote, and didn't pick up any significant amount of new voters. I wouldn't say the basically half of voters who voted against this deserve it.

[–] korazail@lemmy.myserv.one 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

This is the part that hurts the most.

I canvassed, I rallied, I pushed people to vote. I did what I could to ensure the fascist didn't win again, but he still did. Enough of my country either didn't care, found some excuse to not vote for her, or wanted him to to be president.

I was denied a chance at a primary, but I was excited for Kamala. There is no person who can sit and represent 300 million people and make them all happy, but she was more on my side than not, and I'm willing to push for 'better right now' and then push for 'better later' too as distinct events.

As part of the now vocal minority, I don't relish what is to come. I didn't ask for it and I don't want it; but lumped in with 'Americans', we sure seem to.

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Yeah, it sucks. I really wish we would have dealt with the issue when he planned a coup iinstead of basically letting him walk all over everyone back into power.

[–] skeezix@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The 80 million people who didn’t vote deserve it.

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Man, no wonder we go to war with people all the time. Can't even not wish harm on people simply for not voting. Is it frustrating, sure, but i don't wish harm on people over it.