this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2024
116 points (84.9% liked)

Atheism

4119 readers
2 users here now

Community Guide


Archive Today will help you look at paywalled content the way search engines see it.


Statement of Purpose

Acceptable

Unacceptable

Depending on severity, you might be warned before adverse action is taken.

Inadvisable


Application of warnings or bans will be subject to moderator discretion. Feel free to appeal. If changes to the guidelines are necessary, they will be adjusted.


If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathizer or a resemblant of a group that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of any other group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you you will be banned on sight.

Provable means able to provide proof to the moderation, and, if necessary, to the community.

 ~ /c/nostupidquestions

If you want your space listed in this sidebar and it is especially relevant to the atheist or skeptic communities, PM DancingPickle and we'll have a look!


Connect with Atheists

Help and Support Links

Streaming Media

This is mostly YouTube at the moment. Podcasts and similar media - especially on federated platforms - may also feature here.

Orgs, Blogs, Zines

Mainstream

Bibliography

Start here...

...proceed here.

Proselytize Religion

From Reddit

As a community with an interest in providing the best resources to its members, the following wiki links are provided as historical reference until we can establish our own.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Lets take a little break from politics and have us a real atheist conversation.

Personally, I'm open to the idea of the existence of supernatural phenomena, and I believe mainstream religions are actually complicated incomplete stories full of misinterpretations, misunderstandings, and half-truths.

Basically, I think that these stories are not as simple and straightforward as they seem to be to religious people. I feel like there is a lot more to them. Concluding that all these stories are just made up or came out of nowhere is kind of hard for me.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

There are however videos featuring things that cannot be explained rationally

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_effect

Also

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magic_(illusion)

I saw David Copperfield walk through the Great Wall of China on live TV. I don't think he actually walked through the Great Wall of China. I also don't think he made the Statue of Liberty disappear.

I also saw Teller of Penn and Teller drown in a water tank with my own eyes at a live show and he stayed there, dead and unmoving, for the entire intermission. Then he was back on stage a few minutes later.

I do not think Teller drowned and came back from the dead even though that is exactly what I saw.

[–] aLaStOr_MoOdY47@lemmy.world 0 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah, most unexplained videos go through verifications to make sure it's not FX, and when it's not, it's how they end up unexplained. This is especially common in the UFO community.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)

Verification by whom? Why should that person or people be trusted? Do they already have a bias towards believing in the supernatural?

[–] aLaStOr_MoOdY47@lemmy.world 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Now you're just lying. The Pentagon has done no such thing. The closest they have even come to what you are claiming is saying they can't explain it.

[–] aLaStOr_MoOdY47@lemmy.world 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Yes, that's what I'm trying to tell you. Unexplained. That means that The Pentagon has tried to figure out what they were looking at, but they left it as unexplained. We've also had many UAP hearings in congress where they disclosed a bunch of UFOs, and alien stuff. Anyway, yeah. The US govt is embracing the possible existence of extraterrestrial life running around here on Earth.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

No. This is what you said:

Yeah, most unexplained videos go through verifications to make sure it’s not FX, and when it’s not, it’s how they end up unexplained. This is especially common in the UFO community.

Then I asked who did that and you said:

The Pentagon.

They did not do that, you're just lying.

[–] aLaStOr_MoOdY47@lemmy.world 0 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

But they are the ones who released those videos of US navy pilots encountering a UFO, and labeled it as unexplained. Why are you saying that I'm lying?

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Again, this was your claim:

Yeah, most unexplained videos go through verifications to make sure it’s not FX, and when it’s not, it’s how they end up unexplained. This is especially common in the UFO community.

The U.S. military did not do that. Period. It is a lie to claim it did.

[–] aLaStOr_MoOdY47@lemmy.world 0 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Ok lmao. You just keep saying I'm lying but won't say why. It's not that hard to look up 'Pentagon UFO footage'.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

I am literally saying why. They did not verify them to make sure it's not special effects. They didn't because there's no way to do that. I can tell you that as someone who has worked in video production and post-production for over 20 years.

It is simply a lie. They never did that. Looking up "Pentagon UFO footage" will not make it possible to verify such a thing. Also, I happen to know what you're talking about and they never said anything about verifying they were all not special effects because, again, there's no way to do that.

[–] aLaStOr_MoOdY47@lemmy.world 0 points 4 weeks ago