this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2024
116 points (84.9% liked)

Atheism

4119 readers
3 users here now

Community Guide


Archive Today will help you look at paywalled content the way search engines see it.


Statement of Purpose

Acceptable

Unacceptable

Depending on severity, you might be warned before adverse action is taken.

Inadvisable


Application of warnings or bans will be subject to moderator discretion. Feel free to appeal. If changes to the guidelines are necessary, they will be adjusted.


If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathizer or a resemblant of a group that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of any other group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you you will be banned on sight.

Provable means able to provide proof to the moderation, and, if necessary, to the community.

 ~ /c/nostupidquestions

If you want your space listed in this sidebar and it is especially relevant to the atheist or skeptic communities, PM DancingPickle and we'll have a look!


Connect with Atheists

Help and Support Links

Streaming Media

This is mostly YouTube at the moment. Podcasts and similar media - especially on federated platforms - may also feature here.

Orgs, Blogs, Zines

Mainstream

Bibliography

Start here...

...proceed here.

Proselytize Religion

From Reddit

As a community with an interest in providing the best resources to its members, the following wiki links are provided as historical reference until we can establish our own.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Lets take a little break from politics and have us a real atheist conversation.

Personally, I'm open to the idea of the existence of supernatural phenomena, and I believe mainstream religions are actually complicated incomplete stories full of misinterpretations, misunderstandings, and half-truths.

Basically, I think that these stories are not as simple and straightforward as they seem to be to religious people. I feel like there is a lot more to them. Concluding that all these stories are just made up or came out of nowhere is kind of hard for me.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bisby@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago (2 children)

If something can "transcend" the laws of nature, then the ability to do that is part of the laws of nature, and thus it transcends nothing. We just didn't know all of the rules.

If ghosts are real, then they aren't breaking the rules of nature because clearly the rules of nature allow for ghosts, we just don't understand how yet, but then ghosts are natural.

By definition, anything real is natural, and anything supernatural is not.

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee -5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

That's just a weak reformulation of the "God of the gaps" fallacy.

[–] kitnaht@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

The difference is that science is observable and testable, god is not. This key difference, changes it from being a fallacy.

So, in the god of the gaps fallacy it goes like this:

  • GotG: Something unknown = GOD!
  • Science: Something unknown = "We don't know!"
  • GotG: Ghosts = GOD!!
  • Science: Ghosts = "We need a way to reliably test and confirm!"

Science isn't anti-god either. It's just pro-knowledge. Observable, testable, verifiable knowledge.

[–] bisby@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

Science isn’t anti-god either. It’s just pro-knowledge. Observable, testable, verifiable knowledge.

This part. If ghosts are observable, testable, and verifiable, then we would have a way of measuring things. Maybe ghosts are 4th dimensional entities. It's very possible they are real and it's purely something we haven't been able to measure thus far.

Science gets stuff wrong all the time. The point of science is to be adapting and learning. And part of that involves verifying credibility of a new source of information.

Unfortunately, almost all of the sources of "proof" of things like ghosts are heavily biased in favor of proving things over disproving, and there are a lot of people throwing clear scams into the mix. Science needs to go in with an open mind. "I want ghosts to be real, and the wind moved this door, therefore it was a ghost" is not valid proof of ghosts.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WohbNt18wNs Things like this. A pastor that can walk on air, which is clearly fake. If the pastor believed he could walk on air, why would he fake it. This is not proof that people CAN'T walk on air, but it's a great example of why when someone claims they can, you should figure out why lying about it benefits them (this guy clearly wants more people to tithe to his church).

GotG benefits from the default being "GOD!" for all things, because it leaves them in power. Science has no benefit from anything except the truth. Sure there will be liars in science as well and a lot of people will optimistically want to believe the lies if they sound nice, but looking at things like LK-99, it winds up disproven when it's a lie. Capitalism and industry don't care about your fake superconductor. That doesn't benefit them, they only care about real superconductors.