this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2024
163 points (91.4% liked)

Games

16755 readers
938 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 3 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

Well, not really. There was a time when it was Valve staff and volunteer moderators under their direction. But that was before their discussion forums got integrated into Steam directly and there was a bajillion games on it.

Though I am confident they could actually hire people to handle it if they wanted to. Or were forced to. Steam makes a bit of profit, I'm sure.

[โ€“] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 hour ago

You know, I think you are right.

I meant to say when the discussion forums were integrated and basically autogenerated for any game, when Steam went from 'this is our game launcher' to 'soon we will sell every pc game that has ever and will ever exist.'

But when it comes to hiring people to moderate things?

Insanity.

Facebook does this by hiring tens, hundreds of thousands of moderators in economically undeveloped nations, managed by a few thousand based in the US or EU.

Its a horror show sweatshop of constant exposure to the most horrible content imaginable, which basically drives many employees to suicide or insanity.

There is no AI that can do this.

... Valve could maybe? probably? afford to hire hundreds of thousands of low cost moderators following Facebook's model.

But I'm pretty sure that they would basically go, oh, we are now legally responsible for what is said on our platform?

Fuck it, nuke 99% of it from orbit, do a bit of redesign, hire a much smaller cadre of moderators, who will manage a vastly stripped down and more cumbersome and more restrictive ability to comment on or discuss things.

... What would be the downside to that?

12 year olds and morons with no impulse control now use discord instead of the steam forums?

People maybe go back to making their own game based community websites/forums?

... Who is going to stop using Steam because the discussion forums dissapear?

Because all the default comment posting and viewing settings for all the other ways you can leave a public message now flip to being restrictive and time delayed?

I really do stand by my other statement in this thread: You could erase everything that is not from a human, manually pinned discussion thread and nothing of value would be lost.