this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2024
613 points (90.9% liked)

Comic Strips

12626 readers
3215 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lime@feddit.nu -4 points 19 hours ago (1 children)
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 12 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

No, it was just part of a broader culture of infantalism demonstrated by Democratic apologists. There was no there there. Just people desperate for something to blame for their incompetence.

[–] lime@feddit.nu 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

but like... if everyone is saying "don't vote third party", and the amount of third party votes significantly drops as a result, isn't this what the result would look like?

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 12 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

There is a term for the act of only looking for evidence that confirms your bias. If the "strategy" worked, then why isn't Kamala Harris president?

And if that wasn't the goal of the strategy, what point is it that you think was being made in the first place?

[–] lime@feddit.nu 0 points 18 hours ago

i have no idea what the strategy of the us democratic party was, I'm just reflecting on what i've on social media over the past month or so (a constant barrage of "don't vote third party") and comparing it to the results (very few people voting third party). of course there's no way to know how much of that was due to said barrage, but we can for sure say that the people telling people to vote third party failed.