this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2023
133 points (94.6% liked)

Asklemmy

43945 readers
977 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I remember a while back Apple filed a patent that allows concerts to disable iPhones cameras if a certain signal is emitted from the stage. Apple never implemented this, but my pessemistic ass always try to think of worse case scenarios, like being used by government. Do you think this could occur in the future?

Source: https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-36672001

You can search "Apple Concert Disable Camera" and find more about it.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Saigonauticon@voltage.vn 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Haha, what a great idea! I love it! Sending me a signal about things you don't want me to record!

I would build two things. First, an antenna that detects and (using multiple copies) locates these signals on a real time, public-access map.

Second, I'd build a security camera with a wide angle lens that turns ON whenever this signal is received.

Sure, 90% of people don't know how to do these things -- but I do, and I can put them in a store and the results on a website. Most people know how to buy a thing and plug it in, or access a website!

Then I'll manufacture a ton of them at a factory here in Vietnam, and you will be able to buy them at a reasonable price. I'll make a tidy sum, pay a bunch of taxes that will build highways and schools, and you'll have more freedom than you started with.

We all win!

[–] 001100010010@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Tim Apple has joined the chat.

[–] Saigonauticon@voltage.vn 1 points 1 year ago

Sure, why not? It would probably be good fun to talk product development with the CEO of Apple.

Then maybe I can take a look at their implementation and see if I can secure it (standard consulting rates apply). Apple has a lot of good engineers, I bet they already know about the trivial stuff, so I could get right into the interesting problems.

I mean, a naive implementation uses bluetooth LE, but presumably users could just turn bluetooth off (among other problems). I can think of better implementations that don't require radio or internet to work. I think a smarter approach would be optical or audio encoding. That would make it reliable in concerts (where lighting and sound are tightly controlled), but not reliable enough in most police-state contexts (where lighting and sound are not tightly controlled). Fine tuning it further to ensure that it only works in the context of concerts should be pretty easy.

I haven't read the patent though, I don't presently have access to BBC.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sure, 90% of people don’t know how to do these things

I think you dropped a 9 or two.

[–] Saigonauticon@voltage.vn 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm some sort of mercenary science hermit. So take any statement I make about human beings with a grain of salt :D

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Science hermits unite!

I'm less successfully mercenary, though, so I know what I assume is a representative sample of tech muggles. Having thought about it, 1% of people could figure this out, and maybe 0.1% wouldn't have to use other people's tools to do it.

[–] Saigonauticon@voltage.vn 2 points 1 year ago

Hm, uniting people in general is like herding cats. Uniting hermits? Sounds hard. I'll stick to science :D

Being mercenary is largely overrated -- better to try and live a calm and happy life filled with friends and family.

Many opinions have been offered on whether the most valuable attribute in warfare (and by this I mean business) is loyalty or bravery, but few people are willing to admit it's actually just hunger.

[–] The_Mixer_Dude@lemmus.org 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So you are just describing a security camera?

[–] Saigonauticon@voltage.vn 3 points 1 year ago

The camera part would work as a normal camera, sure. However, the fact that it would turn on whenever it detects the 'don't record me' signal is an additional feature that provides context to the video recordings and also logs all times the signal is detected and used.

So similar to the way other popular security cameras provide new features, e.g. a camera that only records when motion is detected.

Anyway it's something I literally just thought up in 15 seconds. Obviously it would be unreasonable to expect a polished, viable, feature-complete product idea. Which are a commodity in any case :D