this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2023
70 points (100.0% liked)

Selfhosted

40149 readers
720 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I am already self-hosting a lot of things for 15+ years now, including git, but I am looking for a solution like Github that is federalized (not Gitlab or the like).

I want people to be able to open issues, PRs, comment, fork or star without having to create an account on my server. Is there anything like that?

I saw radicle.xyz but I am not sure if that is what I want. Basically a lightweight git+ActivityPub + web frontend is what I am looking for. I think. No CI/CD or other fancy features required.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ninjan@lemmy.mildgrim.com 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Gitea is looking into joining ActivityPub as the core framework is called.

[–] pirofti@iusearchlinux.fyi 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Is it not a big no-no to use Gitea now since the commercial takeover? From what I understand, Forgejo is the safe option and I am glad to hear from the other comments that it is getting support for that through ForgeFed!

[–] DARbarian@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Excuse me for being uninformed, but what is this about a corporate Gitea takeover?

[–] poVoq@slrpnk.net 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That is a bit hyperbole. The domains and trademarks where transferred to a for-profit entity (owned by the main devs) and all that was done in relative secrecy which didn't go down well with the open-source community.

However for the time being nothing much changed and Forgejo is more of a "just in case" soft-fork.

[–] Sudo@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

They switched to commercial model last year.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gitea#2022

[–] lz0@kbin.social -1 points 1 year ago

AFAIK Gitea incorporated as a for-profit (which was supported), but there was some perceived(not intended to throw shade on any side here, just keeping it neutral) shady-ness from the perspective of the community. You can read more here in the open letter: https://gitea-open-letter.coding.social/

[–] exu@feditown.com 1 points 1 year ago

There was some drama with the main Forgejo developer that caused a bunch of drama and prompted him to "reboot" the community. I found it on HN a while back, but the drama itself happened in issues and discussions under the Forgejo project.