this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2024
788 points (98.2% liked)

politics

19144 readers
5938 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

“It should come as no great surprise that a Democratic Party which has abandoned working class people would find that the working class has abandoned them,” Sanders said.

“First, it was the white working class, and now it is Latino and Black workers as well. While the Democratic leadership defends the status quo, the American people are angry and want change. And they’re right.”

“Will the big money interests and well-paid consultants who control the Democratic Party learn any real lessons from this disastrous campaign?” Sanders asked.

“Will they understand the pain and political alienation that tens of millions of Americans are experiencing? Do they have any ideas as to how we can take on the increasingly powerful Oligarchy which has so much economic and political power? Probably not.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 399 points 10 hours ago (4 children)

Jesus Christ still more sharp than Trump or Biden. We got fuckin robbed, man.

[–] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 171 points 10 hours ago (1 children)
[–] anarchrist@lemmy.dbzer0.com 107 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Thrice you might say, considering we could have had a primary this time too but for Biden's hubris

[–] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 60 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

I'm not sure he would have ran again even if Biden stepped down in the most graceful way possible to be honest. The second time he ran I remember him saying a large part of why he did was because people kept telling him how much they felt the country needed him, while he himself was having doubts on his ability to fill the office in his age, or weighing the amount of stress it would bring, and even looking at his vote totals and wondering if the country even wanted him as president. He's gotta be tired, and my take on Sanders these past 8 years is if Trump didn't exist he'd have been a happily retired grandpa, and he's just trying to do whatever he thinks has the best chance to stop Trump and American Fascism in general. This perspective seems to make a lot of things line up including this verbal thrashing of his. He does have access to communication with top democratic play-makers, who knows how long hes been telling them something like this.

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 18 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

He specifically said he wouldn't iirc.

[–] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I must have missed that but I believe it.

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 6 points 8 hours ago

https://apnews.com/article/bernie-sanders-biden-endorsement-2024-d8f0772b117e2bf83e1062708ea651c0

On Tuesday, he said that he would not run and he discouraged any another high-profile progressive candidates from doing so either.

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 52 points 8 hours ago

Robbed twice, still tries to help people. Can't say that about most politicians.

[–] lando55@lemmy.world 52 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Now is about the time of year I remember to say "Fuck Debbie Wasserman Shultz"

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Still upset she moved up in positioning in the party. Genuinely feels like she cheated and won with zero consequences.

[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 12 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

She's probably on AIPAC payroll. Can't upset America's boss.

[–] AgentDalePoopster@lemmy.world 8 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

AIPAC gave her more than 400k this year alone.

[–] Cataphract@lemmy.ml 7 points 5 hours ago

geez you weren't kidding

Several other Democrats who voted to censure Tlaib were among the top recipients of AIPAC funds in November, including Florida Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz ($141,058) (link)

and that was in January. If it's any consolation, the evil is slowly draining her life away it seems.

2016 : image 2023: image

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 hour ago

Yes. But this is not news... We've known this for years.