Yea, I mean Watchdogs 2, The Division, Steep, I know some friends loved For Honor and R6: Siege is amazing (idk how the game looks today tho with all the updates they made).

Seems people tend to see ubisoft as AC and FarCry only.

[–] BonerMan@ani.social 1 points 27 minutes ago

Some people love to shit on ubisoft when others are way worse.

[–] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

1602 was the best Anno. Fight me.

[–] BonerMan@ani.social 1 points 32 minutes ago (1 children)

OK, I personally think 1404 with the interesting and challenging campaign including the Venice dlc was the top, afterwards I think 1800 is the next best. My most controversial opinion is that both 2070 and 2205 where good and well made games, with some flaws of course but that doesn't mean its bad. Shure some disliked the setting and I was septic as well.

[–] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 1 points 29 minutes ago* (last edited 28 minutes ago) (1 children)

Never played the futuristic ones. What appealed to me with the anno games was the atmosphere of sails and settlers.

[–] BonerMan@ani.social 1 points 15 minutes ago

They bring that atmosphere to the future settings very well actually

[–] icecreamtaco@lemmy.world 1 points 33 minutes ago (1 children)

Their current Monopoly game is infamously bad

[–] BonerMan@ani.social -1 points 30 minutes ago (1 children)

OK, but who gives a shit about a monopoly game? Either play it like a normal person, when drinking with friends or don't.

[–] icecreamtaco@lemmy.world 2 points 14 minutes ago (1 children)

I’ve watched huge vtubers play it multiple times and every single time the game ends early from a crash. Or the game accidentally bankrupts a player. It’s bad publicity

[–] BonerMan@ani.social 1 points 8 minutes ago

HM... Yeah thats Bad publicity.

But that never happened to me, and I played both games for over 200 hours each. I even played them on Linux through emulation and it didn't happen.