Asklemmy

43945 readers

1001 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

Should we A) colonise other planets or B) build habitats in the middle of space, like O'Neill Cylinders and stuff? (lemmy.ml)

submitted 3 weeks ago by KevinFromSpace@lemmy.ml to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

158 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] BelieveRevolt@hexbear.net 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Every industry exploits the working class under capitalism.

Are we colonizing planets or building habitats in space right now or any time in the perceivable future, though? No, so beyond a fun thought experiment or sci-fi material, it's not an idea worth giving any serious thought towards.

[–] witx@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Right because innovation materializes itself when we want ... We just flicked our fingers and airplane, cellphone and others just appeared.

Who are you to tell what we should or should not pursue?

[–] BelieveRevolt@hexbear.net 6 points 3 weeks ago

Are we pursuing colonizing planets or building space habitats in any serious way?