this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2024
615 points (97.4% liked)

196

16423 readers
1698 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ObviouslyNotBanana@lemmy.world 34 points 6 days ago (13 children)

It's literally the only subscription I think is worth having. But I get it, you do you!

[–] moonburster@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

What are the features that brought you over? I had it before, but YouTube music was too lackluster for me (polish, sound quality, ease of searching) and for the YouTube part I use van Ed on mobile and ublock

[–] ObviouslyNotBanana@lemmy.world 14 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I like that creators still get some compensation while I get to not think about ads.

[–] moonburster@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago

That's a good reason.

[–] msage@programming.dev 3 points 6 days ago (2 children)
[–] ObviouslyNotBanana@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

I'm not sure of the exact numbers, but I remember recently listening to a podcast or something where they mentioned that premium users' views are worth a little bit more than ad watchers on average. I'm assuming that's because there's no third party advertiser that needs a cut.

[–] CleoTheWizard@lemmy.world 10 points 6 days ago

Quite a bit. For your subscription YouTube will take 45%. The other 55% are split among other creators by watch time of the subscriber. For what it’s worth, the creators I watch love that system and benefit from it quite a bit. It’s more consistent and safer than ad revenue.

load more comments (11 replies)