this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2024
92 points (91.1% liked)

politics

19097 readers
5963 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Hopium? This blog is suggesting an incredible margin of victory for Harris.

VDH is the website. They are outright calling respected meta-polls FiveThirtyEight and RCP completely wrong. Their overall argument is that the Senate-race is incredibly favored in the Democrat's favor.

I don't know if I necessarily believe that argument. But its still interesting to think about. Discuss?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dragontamer@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

Florida going for Harris is a huge wtf in this blog post. It's a bold prediction far against every other poll I've seen.

If Harris wins FL, then Trump is just completely fucked.

Mind you: FL is basically Trump's home state as New Yorkers dont like him, and Mar-a-lago resort was his main base of operation in 2016. I find it very unlikely for Trump to lose FL, even with all the points brought up in this blog post.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Well, it makes sense, on one hand, but not in another.

Where it makes sense:

  • the population centers are pro-Dem.
  • DeSantis is wildly unpopular with everybody.
  • FL businesses benefit from immigrant agriculture workers only second to CA.
  • Abortion is on the ballot

Where it doesn't make sense:

  • Gerrymandered County distribution basically makes electing Harris basically impossible right now
  • People have been moving away from the coastal cities
  • An influx of MAGA people moving to FL

It's less likely to happen. Not impossible. AZ is way more likely.

[–] the_tab_key@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Gerrymandering has nothing to do with the presidential election.

[–] kata1yst@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It does when your nearest polling station is across town. This is one of the many games they play in districting.

[–] the_tab_key@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah, but that's "easy" to do without gerrymandering as well.

[–] scarabine@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 2 weeks ago

According to some of the forecasts I’ve seen that suggest a strong chance for a Harris win (as in, 77% chance) she only has a 3% chance to turn FL blue. So, not really plausible, but there are a few scenarios that see her winning it.