Comic Strips

12577 readers

3392 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

The post can be a single image, an image gallery, or a link to a specific comic hosted on another site (the author's website, for instance).
The comic must be a complete story.
If it is an external link, it must be to a specific story, not to the root of the site.
You may post comics from others or your own.
If you are posting a comic of your own, a maximum of one per week is allowed (I know, your comics are great, but this rule helps avoid spam).
The comic can be in any language, but if it's not in English, OP must include an English translation in the post's 'body' field (note: you don't need to select a specific language when posting a comic).
Politeness.
Adult content is not allowed. This community aims to be fun for people of all ages.

Web of links

!linuxmemes@lemmy.world: "I use Arch btw"
!memes@lemmy.world: memes (you don't say!)

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

lawrence@lemmy.world

419

Jurassic [Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal] (www.smbc-comics.com)

submitted 4 weeks ago by kersploosh@sh.itjust.works to c/comicstrips@lemmy.world

16 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Source: https://www.smbc-comics.com/comic/jurassic-2

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 51 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (2 children)

Economics really sucks at accounting for the value of human life. I remember there was a study on the financial impacts that smokers have on society. The idea going in was that smokers would get health issues which would cause a financial drain on societies which pay for people's healthcare. The study actually found that smokers weren't a drain at all. Smokers tended to die quickly, meaning no chronic health treatments. More importantly, they died young. Meaning they didn't cash in their government pensions. Governments were essentially profiting off smokers. The study did another analysis, this time putting in a fake number for the "value of life" and the result was as expected. Smoking is a negative because it kills people.

[–] 14th_cylon@lemm.ee 25 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

you may be thinking about this study: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_Finance_Balance_of_Smoking_in_the_Czech_Republic

there is also famous ford pinto scandal, where ford pinto would sometime catch fire during relatively small rear-end collisions, ford knew about the problem, the change in design would cost $15.30 per car, yet ford decided it is cheaper to let few people die and deal with the consequences.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grimshaw_v._Ford_Motor_Co.

[–] teegus@sh.itjust.works 14 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

Economics is a tool, and yes of course you can get different conclusions based on different assumptions. Doesn't mean economics is bad, just means it is being used in different ways and for different purposes. Same with statistics. assumpsions are important.

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 12 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

The economy is a fake religion we made up to explain the psychology of mass amounts of peoples spending habits. Then we put everybody's money into 401ks bcz it was cheaper than pensions, and told them if the economy does bad they don't get to retire.