this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2024
213 points (95.7% liked)

PC Gaming

8568 readers
341 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org -2 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

It really isn't. Companies absolutely love using it as an excuse for why their shit product sold like shit, but these people are absolutely out there.

Go spend 10 minutes on 4chan's /v/ideogames board or /b/ - Random board for the most obvious and quick demonstration.


Double edit: will respond to your response

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I don't base my view of society on fringe opinions esp if they are linked to corpo propaganda.

I highly doubt most people share this sentiment. But normal healthy opinions are not provocative, they don't get people going so online discussions is all about blowing up fringe opinions

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

While true, that is absolutely not what you were saying.

People having fringe opinions are still people who exist. Your personal choices about how much they matter or don't doesn't materially effect their existence.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org -2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I am saying that basing your argument based on some opinions posted on 4chan is a 🤡 exercise

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 month ago

No, you explicitly were saying that you had never heard anyone criticise a piece of media for including a minority.

Then you claimed that it was a strawman (further implying such people do not exist).

I pointed out that those people do exist, most obviously on 4chan, and that whether or not you think they matter has no bearing on whether or not they exist.

I never made any claims as to how important those opinions on 4chan were. I likewise did not say anything about them only existing there.

Pretending people with those opinions do not exist is provably wrong with minimal effort and intellectually dishonest. There's no argument I'm making here. Nothing but me pointing out fact that you have decided doesn't matter because some companies have used it as to excuse valid criticism.

We can all see your comment history in this chain man. Moving the goalposts like this is just sad.

Comments in case they are edited or deleted after being called out

[–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There's nothing in this conversation that you could even consider a strawman, yet, so I don't know what you think that word means.

However, I must just assume you aren't part of a minority community if you haven't been affected by people constantly bitching about how some piece of media is too woke now because it had a woman/gay person/trans person/person of colour existing in the content. Yes, they are a vocal minority. But it is by no means uncommon to encounter them.

You may see substantially less of it on Lemmy since it is a predominantly left leaning space in general, and the left tends to be more accepting of non cishet white male presence

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org -5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

must just assume you aren't part of a minority community if you haven't been affected by people constantly bitching about how some piece of media is too woke now because it had a woman/gay person/trans person/person of colour existing in the content.

You are "affaceted" by the shit people say online about video games?

You do understand that at any given everything you can imagine is being said?

Do you go out of your way to find this "content" to get "triggered"?

People have a right to criticize video games and their developers, it is your right to make a judgement if that criticism is valid.

I am not following how you are "affected" by online discussions lol

[–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 8 points 1 month ago

Eh, I gave you the benefit of the doubt but it doesn't seem you're here to have a good faith discussion.

People have every right to criticise whatever they want. I never said they didn't. Goodbye, troll.