this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2021
16 points (94.4% liked)

Asklemmy

43399 readers
797 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I find this question tough. Catching criminals is great but what about breaking encryption?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] poVoq@lemmy.ml 13 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Given the (good) state of encryption it is basically never "breaking" encryption, but rather somehow circumventing it. Sadly this usually means installing some trojan on the devices exploiting a OS vulnerability.

This is a really bad idea for two reasons:

  1. It gives law-enforcement an incentive to buy exploits and keep quiet about them afterwards and thus making devices much less secure and bugs are intentionally not fixed.

  2. Once such a trojan is installed on a device it can not only be used to search for evidence, but just as easily to plant false evidence, which is sadly not as unlikely to happen as it sounds at first.

[โ€“] the_tech_beast@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

Planting of false evidence is something that we will have to worry about. It will probably be more common.