this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2024
544 points (99.3% liked)

196

16489 readers
3751 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] candybrie@lemmy.world 48 points 1 month ago (4 children)

I would like some houses without people. Having a little surplus is usually a good thing. So like if some houses become unlivable, we have houses for the suddenly unhoused people.

[–] BleatingZombie@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

But then the house will be lonely :(

[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Run it as a pet café. In the above-mentioned emergency, people can move in, but they have to foster the pets.

[–] BleatingZombie@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

That's perfect. I'm voting for you for king of the world

[–] match@pawb.social 11 points 1 month ago

no houses without people while there's people without houses

[–] frezik@midwest.social 3 points 1 month ago

That part of things could be aimed a China. They have something like double the amount of housing their population needs. To someone in a country with out of control housing prices, that might sound like a good problem to have, but it's still wasteful.