this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2024
308 points (99.0% liked)

Mildly Interesting

17585 readers
9 users here now

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don't spam.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TheMightyCanuck@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Damn, that's a pretty low step goal for a full day... 2700?

I thought the normal average for good health was 10k

[–] LittleTarsier@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 months ago (4 children)

10,000 was actually a fabrication. Benefits are greatest around 8700 steps.

[–] Bongles@lemm.ee 7 points 2 months ago

And it also was never all or nothing. I keep my goal at 6000 just because 10k (i didn't know about 8700) isn't realistic for me. It's still better than what I would walk normally.

[–] TheMightyCanuck@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 months ago

Basically the benifits of walking (on lowering all-cause mortality) sort of plateau at 8700...

10k still isn't a bad metric to strive for.

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Don't be intimidated though. If you're not regularly exercising, start with a smaller goal And increase at a rate you're comfortable with. Walking is a great activity and is great for your body and easier on your knees than running.

The point is to do more than you are now.

[–] Duranie@literature.cafe 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

What I appreciate about my Garmin is that it adjusts my step goals up and down to make them achievable. Miss my goal for the day? The next day is a few steps less. Hit my goal? The next is a few steps more. I get the satisfaction of reaching goals, but don't feel bad about myself if I miss.

[–] LittleTarsier@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 months ago

I had no idea this was a thing, thank you!

[–] WolfLink@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago

It sounds like whoever said 10k rounded up. Doesn’t seem unreasonable imo.

[–] SuperSaiyanSwag@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Might be like Garmin where it automatically adjusts goal based on the historical data

[–] TheMightyCanuck@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago

Totally true. Didn't think of that aspect

[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

It's just for office days because I do a lot of computer time. I dont pay attention otherwise and have a different watch I wear for my normal outdoor activities. It's three times thicker and has no space left for health-related sensors or a pedometer. But if this one approximates just 1km is 1,000 steps, I'm doubling down on not needing to care about steps outside of office days.

[–] WolfLink@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Wait 1km is 1000 steps sounds like some pretty big steps

[–] Krzd@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Yeah, normal step lengths are around 60 - 80 cm depending on height and pace

EDIT: obviously injured/elderly people are much lower, and running is much higher, which might explain the distance if OP's watch thought he was running

[–] TheMightyCanuck@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago

Thank you for the elaboration OP!