this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2024
112 points (95.9% liked)

Games

16761 readers
900 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works
112
Baldur's Gate 3 Dev Suggests Next Game May Come in 2029, but Maybe Not: ‘Don’t Hold Us to a Date’ (www.ign.com)
submitted 1 month ago by nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works to c/games@sh.itjust.works
18 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

There's no reason to believe that there was anything special about one of the highest reviewed games of all time?

[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Their previous games, like divinity: original sin 2, were also amazing, though somewhat smaller in scale/budget

[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Sure, but playing through D:OS2 right now, there's still quite a bit more in BG3 that was special.

[–] Cyberspark@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Bigger budget means more people and more time which let you spend more time on the little details. They were capable of BG3 after D:OS2, whether they did it or not. They're still capable of it. There's nothing special about the BG IP that means they can't make a game of similar quality in any other setting.

[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

There's more than little details that I appreciate in BG3 over D:OS2, but I think that's just a team that got better at their craft.

[–] Cyberspark@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Something being popular doesn't mean it's good just as something being unpopular doesn't mean it's bad. I'm not saying it's not better than their other titles, but there's nothing specifically remarkable about the BG IP that made it better than if it were in any other setting.

[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

Ah, that reads a little different than your previous comment. Yeah, I'm looking forward to what they do next, but especially given that this was their best game yet, I definitely don't agree that they were held back in any way.