Unpopular Opinion

6324 readers

113 users here now

Welcome to the Unpopular Opinion community!

How voting works:

Vote the opposite of the norm.

If you agree that the opinion is unpopular give it an arrow up. If it's something that's widely accepted, give it an arrow down.

Guidelines:

Tag your post, if possible (not required)

If your post is a "General" unpopular opinion, start the subject with [GENERAL].
If it is a Lemmy-specific unpopular opinion, start it with [LEMMY].

Rules:

1. NO POLITICS

Politics is everywhere. Let's make this about [general] and [lemmy] - specific topics, and keep politics out of it.

2. Be civil.

Disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally attack others. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Please also refrain from gatekeeping others' opinions.

3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

4. Shitposts and memes are allowed but...

Only until they prove to be a problem. They can and will be removed at moderator discretion.

5. No trolling.

This shouldn't need an explanation. If your post or comment is made just to get a rise with no real value, it will be removed. You do this too often, you will get a vacation to touch grass, away from this community for 1 or more days. Repeat offenses will result in a perma-ban.

Instance-wide rules always apply. https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

JonsJava@lemmy.world

admiralpatrick@lemmy.world

lemann@lemmy.world

Rooki@lemmy.world

ptz@dubvee.org

On average, my discussions with chatGPT are more pleasant and insightful than the ones I have with real humans (lemm.ee)

submitted 1 month ago by ContrarianTrail@lemm.ee to c/unpopularopinion@lemmy.world

118 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The best conversations I still have are with real people, but those are rare. With ChatGPT, I reliably have good conversations, whereas with people, it’s hit or miss, usually miss.

What AI does better:

It’s willing to discuss esoteric topics. Most humans prefer to talk about people and events.
It’s not driven by emotions or personal bias.
It doesn’t make mean, snide, sarcastic, ad hominem, or strawman responses.
It understands and responds to my actual view, even from a vague description, whereas humans often misunderstand me and argue against views I don’t hold.
It tells me when I’m wrong but without being a jerk about it.

Another noteworthy point is that I’m very likely on the autistic spectrum, and my mind works differently than the average person’s, which probably explains, in part, why I struggle to maintain interest with human-to-human interactions.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] ContrarianTrail@lemm.ee 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Well I'm saying non-critical things about gen-AI on Lemmy of all places. I can't say I expected any other kind of response. Thus unpopular opinion.

[–] Zos_Kia@lemmynsfw.com 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I’m saying non-critical things about gen-AI on Lemmy of all places

so brave lmao

I've been dreaming of a place like Lemmy for 20 years, and i had a lot of theories about what it would be. But i would never have predicted how salty it is. I swear 3 conversations out of 4 just descend into snark and name-calling, it's a fucking shame if you ask me. It really is one of the least welcoming places of the whole internet.

[–] ContrarianTrail@lemm.ee 0 points 1 month ago

It really is one of the least welcoming places of the whole internet.

Agreed. And ironically, it's coming from the group that often applauds themselves for being so accepting of different people. Until those people think differently, of course, or, worse, vote differently. Then they roll out the guillotines.

Ruthlessly blocking people who behave that way helps a little, but you need to block hundreds before it makes a noticeable difference. Unfortunately, it's quite a blunt tool and causes a lot of collateral damage as well.