this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2024
835 points (97.6% liked)

TenForward: Where Every Vulcan Knows Your Name

3743 readers
1217 users here now

/c/TenFoward: Your home-away-from-home for all things Star Trek!

Re-route power to the shields, emit a tachyon pulse through the deflector, and post all the nonsense you want. Within reason of course.

~ 1. No bigotry. This is a Star Trek community. Remember that diversity and coexistence are Star Trek values. Any post/comments that are racist, anti-LGBT, or generally "othering" of a group will result in removal/ban.

~ 2. Keep it civil. Disagreements will happen both on lore and preferences. That's okay! Just don't let it make you forget that the person you are talking to is also a person.

~ 3. Use spoiler tags. This applies to any episodes that have dropped within 3 months prior of your posting. After that it's free game.

~ 4. Keep it Trek related. This one is kind of a gimme but keep as on topic as possible.

~ 5. Keep posts to a limit. We all love Star Trek stuff but 3-4 posts in an hour is plenty enough.

~ 6. Try to not repost. Mistakes happen, we get it! But try to not repost anything from within the past 1-2 months.

~ 7. No General AI Art. Posts of simple AI art do not 'inspire jamaharon'

~ **8. Political commentary is allowed, but please keep discussions civil. Read here for our community's expectations.

Fun will now commence.


Sister Communities:

!startrek@lemmy.world

!memes@lemmy.world

!tumblr@lemmy.world

!lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world

Want your community to be added to the sidebar? Just ask one of our mods!


Honorary Badbitch:

@jawa21@startrek.website for realizing that the line used to be "want to be added to the sidebar?" and capitalized on it. Congratulations and welcome to the sidebar. Stamets is both ashamed and proud.


Creator Resources:

Looking for a Star Trek screencap? (TrekCore)

Looking for the right Star Trek typeface/font for your meme? (Thank you @kellyaster for putting this together!)


founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I'm pretty sure by the end, even Roddenberry had come to accept that humans will never be so selfless as a species and the Starfleet he dreamt of could never exist. That's why his later stuff was more bleak. There's just absolutely no way that the money free world they describe is good for everyone

[–] Supervisor194@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I believe there is a way. Nanotechnology helped along by artificial intelligence could conceivably bring material abundance to everyone. This would be a world dramatically reshaped. Humanity might not even qualify as the same species anymore.

Some people actually think that such a future is an inevitability; that it can't be stopped. Short of everybody dying in a fire of course.

[–] Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I think the human race dying before we reach those dreams is far more likely

[–] Supervisor194@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

No sense worrying about it then. I know I don't.

[–] Taalnazi@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

My cynical perspective is that people will monetise that nanotechnology before long

[–] Duke_Nukem_1990@feddit.org 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What makes you think the powers that be would make this accessible to the poor?

[–] yeather@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago

There has never been a case where governments are able to hide technology from the people for more than a decade at a time in modern history. It might start out expensive, innovations usually do, but over time the expense drops, someone makes a quick buck selling to the masses, and all of a sudden money is meaningless.

Worst case scenario you may have to use your second amendment rights to acquire the technology for the masses, which is what it was designed for.

[–] not_a_dog@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

There’s just absolutely no way that the money free world they describe is good for everyone.

Can you elaborate, please? In a hypothetical future where money doesn't exist and technology has granted everyone the means and freedom to pursue their own interests (as long as those interests aren't harmful to others, of course), I'm having difficulty understanding why that wouldn't be amazing. Maybe not perfect, but vastly improved over what we're stuck with now.