this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2024
1159 points (87.9% liked)

Comic Strips

12104 readers
2622 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Credit Andy Singer 2024

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

That's how colonizers always are. Think about how much Afrikaners wailed and gnashed their teeth? Or French Algerians? Or, again, the white US South which construted a whole identity around being victims?

Settlers are settlers wherever they go. The decolonial struggle not only rehumanizes the colonized, it rehumanizes the colonizer as they are forced to recognize the pain and suffering of others. They still have to be defeated, regardless of their own whining.

That's also why denazification is necessary - these people need to be forced to recognize the humanity of others or they'll just migrate to Europe and America and be racist there.

[–] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The decolonial struggle

shouldn't this technically be anti-colonial instead?

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Anticolonial struggles are struggles against colonialism, the decolonial struggle is the struggle for decolonisation once colonization has already happened.

[–] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

how are those significantly different?

Anti colonialism would be against colonialism as you said. Presumably to stop encroaching colonialism, to stop existing colonialism, or to gain independence.

decolonialism just seems like a really weird specific to use here since normally context would provide that. Also if we're talking about palestine, wouldn't israel be actively colonizing palestine, instead of having already colonized it? Like you can't just start making outposts in a region that you haven't already colonized. You can't just make settlements in a place that isn't already colonized.

They wouldn't be settlements/outposts if they weren't colonial by nature. Like surely it can't already be colonized if hamas exists. The end game of colonization is literally integration and assimilation. A decolonial struggle would be something like hawaii being brought back to the ownership and independence of the natives.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The settlements are colonial. Resistance against already existing settlements and settlers is decolonial. Preventing more settlements is anticolonial.

They're both relevant in the Palestinian context, I just focused on decolonisation because it recognizes the already existing colonization. I guess it probably should be anticolonial/decolonial to recognize both.

[–] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The settlements are colonial. Resistance against already existing settlements and settlers is decolonial. Preventing more settlements is anticolonial.

i mean i guess in that context it would be, but then wouldn't this be an anti/de colonial resistance? Since there are most definitely both going on.

They’re both relevant in the Palestinian context, I just focused on decolonisation because it recognizes the already existing colonization. I guess it probably should be anticolonial/decolonial to recognize both.

yeah this was pretty much my thinking.

I think if you wanted to recognize the colonial aspects it's probably better to just mention the outposts and settlements lol. Sometimes demonstrating a concept is more powerful than the concept itself.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I also consider the so-called state of Israel to be an example of colonization, because literally it took a bunch of European Jewish settlers to come down from Europe and drive out the indigenous population during the Nakba. It's not just the settlements and outposts.