23
GM's Ultium Batteries To Get a Massive Performance Boost Next Year With Help From CATL - autoevolution
(www.autoevolution.com)
this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2024
23 points (96.0% liked)
[Dormant] Electric Vehicles
3202 readers
2 users here now
We have moved to:
A community for the sharing of links, news, and discussion related to Electric Vehicles.
Rules
- No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, casteism, speciesism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
- Be respectful, especially when disagreeing. Everyone should feel welcome here.
- No self-promotion.
- No irrelevant content. All posts must be relevant and related to plug-in electric vehicles — BEVs or PHEVs.
- No trolling.
- Policy, not politics. Submissions and comments about effective policymaking are allowed and encouraged in the community, however conversations and submissions about parties, politicians, and those devolving into general tribalism will be removed.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Avoiding GM and using the most current tech are both bad ideas, for the same reason: Tesla is owned by a horrible person.
After subtracting the expected quantity of deception in Chinese advertising, this new battery tech from China is still not as good as what Tesla has already been making for the last several years.
You are comparing apples to oranges here since this is an LFP battery while the Tesla 4680 isn't.
The battery's chemistry isn't important to the end user. Price, capacity, longevity, and charge time is. If we assume CATL inflates their stats by the amount that's standard for their market, we can infer their new battery is almost as good as Tesla's old battery in terms of mechanical utility to the end user - their only hope of competing is to win big on price.
I hope they can win that competition. I'd love to see GM produce an EV that's almost as good as a Tesla and a lot cheaper.
Avoiding GM is always a good idea in my opinion. :)