United States | News & Politics

7211 readers

787 users here now

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

pangyuehung@lemmy.ml

yogthos@lemmy.ml

410

The US regime just executed another innocent black man. (innocenceproject.org)

submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by dessalines@lemmy.ml to c/usa@lemmy.ml

159 comments fedilink hide all child comments

More context:

https://innocenceproject.org/cases/marcellus-williams/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] selokichtli@lemmy.ml 29 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There are a lot of governments in the world that agree with you. Not the US government, not at all.

[–] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 19 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

doubt show me a state in the entire world that doesn't exist because it has captured a monopoly over legitimate violence. The best the subjects of a state can hope for is that state violence is only ever implicit, but if there was no threat of being put to death or seriously harmed for individuals that threaten the continued existence of a state, that state would cease to be.

However, it is true that America is particularly brutal with regards to executing civilians. Something that stands out is that, compared to other countries that regularly execute their citizens, there's a pretty obvious skew in terms of who's getting the death penalty. Compared to China, for example, the US hasn't executed anyone for white collar crime in a long time (hopefully someone can find a reference to the last time it happened, I'm not sure where to check) but appears to be killing Black and Muslim folks awfully often. Really makes you think, right?

[–] heggs_bayer@hexbear.net 12 points 1 month ago

Compared to China...

inb4 China bad

[–] selokichtli@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

You are deflecting from the issue here. Legitimate violence, whatever you and I understand for "legitimate" is not the issue, since I guess we can recognize that violence is gradual. We are talking death penalty and it's derivations in the US judicial system. There are a lot of states that won't just systematically kill their citizens and citizens from other countries. A type of zealot entitlement is needed by their governments to keep doing it in cases like this.

[–] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 5 points 1 month ago

I'm mostly just going to disengage because I think we're really on the same side here and I'm just being a pedant on a thread about an innocent man being murdered, but I think you're kinda missing the point too. Social murder happens literally everywhere constantly, even socialist countries.

[–] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 month ago

well yeah, war is a human constant, there is no fixed way to dispute arbitrary claims such as "land rights" and "dibs" on ownership of things outside of war. I mean sure there's legal agreements, but if you don't agree, it's null and void, now nothing matters anymore. I guess you could simply play rock paper scissors for dibs but i don't imagine that's going to be very popular.

This is even a constant within evolutionary biology and the animal kingdom at large. Modern predators are only so deadly because it was advantageous to reproduction.