Technology

58244 readers

6103 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

551

Don’t ever hand your phone to the cops (www.theverge.com)

submitted 16 hours ago by Amicitas@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

149 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] helenslunch@feddit.nl 4 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

in some jurisdictions, failure to identify is an arrestable offense

There's nowhere in the US that is true without reasonable, articulable suspicion (Terry v Ohio)

explicitly state that you are exercising your fifth amendment rights.

You really don't need to do that unless you've already started answering questions, but it is good practice.

[–] fadedmaster@sh.itjust.works 2 points 26 minutes ago (1 children)

Keep in mind that the cops don't have to provide you with their reasonable suspicion in order to demand ID. It's not until court that they have to provide their reasonable suspicion. So they have plenty of time to come up with justification after the fact.

Also, on the Fifth Amendment I thought I had read somewhere about a case where a man simply remained silent and never once invoked his right and it didn't end well for him. I cannot remember the details, but for some reason I thought that you still had to invoke the fifth even if you have not yet answered any questions. I'll have to look back into this later and post back if I find the story.

[–] helenslunch@feddit.nl 1 points 20 minutes ago

So they have plenty of time to come up with justification after the fact.

Sure, if they have any.

I thought I had read somewhere about a case where a man simply remained silent and never once invoked his right and it didn't end well for him.

Yeah the footnote from that case was that he started answering questions and then clammed up later. For some reason that doesn't work.