this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2024
269 points (98.9% liked)

News

23011 readers
3882 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The Georgia hospital that failed to save Amber Thurman may have broken a federal law when doctors there waited 20 hours to perform a procedure criminalized by the state’s abortion ban, according to Sen. Ron Wyden, chair of the Senate Finance Committee.

The Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act, or EMTALA, requires hospitals to provide emergency care to stabilize patients who need it — or transfer them to a hospital that can. Passed nearly four decades ago, the law applies to any hospital with an emergency department and that accepts Medicare funding, which includes the one Thurman went to, Piedmont Henry in suburban Atlanta. The finance committee has authority over the regulatory agency that enforces the law.

In a letter sent Monday, Wyden, an Oregon Democrat, cites ProPublica’s investigation into Thurman’s death, which was found preventable by a state committee of maternal health experts. The senator’s letter asks Piedmont CEO David Kent whether the hospital has delayed or denied emergency care to pregnant patients since Georgia’s abortion ban went into effect. (Kent did not respond to requests for comment.)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Compared to FDR, Democrats have moved left on health care (Medicare, ACA), gay rights (RFMA), race (VRA, Civil Rights Act), social welfare (Medicaid, SCHIP), women's rights (Civil Rights Act, Lily Ledbetter), environment (IRA), drugs (multiple statewide decriminalization laws) ...

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth -3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Are you not paying attention? How many people with Medicare and insurance can actually afford healthcare? Vra? Voting rights? How's that going? Civil rights? How is that going? How many are incarcerated for nothing and next to nothing and performing slave labor? How many were wrongfully executed? Environment? Yeah, how's that going? Statewide drug decrim and federal raids or businesses can't bank. Women's rights? 🤣 Please. How about human rights? Gaza. How about hungry kids in school? Working class living in cars, sleeping rough. Please.

Eta zero irony that you're arguing any of this, let alone women's rights, in a thread about a woman who died because she couldn't get reproductive care. Because doctors, not politicians. Sure. 😒

[–] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's a long list of problems that FDR didn't put any effort into solving, at all.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth -2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Congratulations. He started with nothing. We started with a LOT.

[–] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If you support everything FDR did, but nothing more, then by definition you are neither to the left nor the right of FDR.

If you support everything FDR did, except you also support the tiniest bit of health care reform, then by definition you are to the left of FDR.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth -3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah. Thanks for addressing my points on how much we didn't gain and how much we've lost.

[–] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Believe it or not, there is another political party in the US. They are supported by half the country and are successfully advancing their agenda, in part because people like you don't put any effort into stopping them.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth -2 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Unless you vote for Democrats, you really aren't.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth -2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's what they've been telling me since Nixon, Dems keep moving right.

[–] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No, they aren't.

If you're old enough to remember Nixon then you're old enough to remember Phil Gramm, Zell Miller, and Sam Nunn. All of them Democrats who were more conservative than any Democrat today.

More recently, Lieberman, Manchin, and Sinema all left the party. Every time a conservative Democrat leaves, the party center of gravity moves left.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth -2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Right. That's why people today can afford a mortgage, vehicle, kids, higher education for them, health care and decent food, like they could then. How dare I believe my lying eyes.

[–] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Your eyes will tell you that Republicans successfully fought all those things, yet you refuse to believe them.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth -2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Did Dems codify Roe in 50 years? Keep tuition affordable? Chemicals out of food? Fund the EPA? Correct the climate? Crack down on big industry polluters? Give meaningful punishment for price gouging? Meaningfully address health (ACA means fa if people are still dying from preventable causes)? Keep carcinogens out of our food and water supply? Our air? Shore up voting? Reign in big banks? Did they address over criminalization? Get rid of prison slavery? Wage slavery? Stop couping other countries? Show up unions? Hire more air traffic controllers? Stop supporting genocide? The list is interminable. You can have the last word. You can keep people blind. I won't.

[–] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

If you've really old enough to remember Nixon, then you should know that Democratic administrations are only able to accomplish one major legislative initiative, and sometimes not even that.

  • FDR: Social Security
  • JFK: Civil Rights Act
  • LBJ: Medicare
  • Carter: nothing
  • Clinton: nothing
  • Obama: ACA
  • Biden: IRA

If you expect Democrats to make major progress on multiple problems at once, then you simply don't understand how US politics work. The system is not meant to deliver rapid progress at the national level. That's why many of the things on your list are addressed at the state level instead.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Unfortunately, not nothing for Clinton. His major initiative was NAFTA and he deserves all the criticism he's gotten for it.

Otherwise, I don't disagree with you.

[–] SaltySalamander@fedia.io 4 points 1 week ago

NAFTA negotiations began in 1988, during Bush Sr's term. Clinton only signed it, as it was a mostly complete agreement by the time he took office. Hell, the idea for NAFTA was literally a part of Reagan's '80 presidential campaign.

[–] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago