this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2024
106 points (98.2% liked)

World News

38634 readers
1994 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

And if the leader of the second biggest party would rather work with the third biggest party?

Then the biggest party could well remain out of government, because someone decided that a different coalition would form the government.

The virtue of a two party popular vote is that once the votes are counted there is a clear winner determined by the voters, and nobody can change the winner behind the scenes.

[–] friendlymessage@feddit.org 4 points 1 week ago

As long as the coalition represents the majority, I don't see why the largest party needs to be part of the government. The largest party doesn't represent the will of the people by itself, otherwise they would have a majority.

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Yes, that ends up happening sometimes, but the winner will at least be allowed to try.

[–] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Coalition building happens in a two party system, too. The difference is that it happens before the election, not after. That way the voters, not the coalition builders, get the final say.

[–] friendlymessage@feddit.org 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

In a two party system the power balance within the coalition is decided behind closed doors and the voters have no say in it

[–] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

That's true, but they have complete control of who wins the election.

[–] friendlymessage@feddit.org 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Two choices is not complete control

[–] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

The winner of the election reflects the will of the majority of voters. That's the most control you can get in a democracy.

[–] friendlymessage@feddit.org 1 points 6 days ago

Lol, sure it does

[–] atro_city@fedia.io 1 points 1 week ago

They did. They proposed a candidate and she wasn't accepted.