this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2024
426 points (97.5% liked)

196

16276 readers
4259 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Gork@lemm.ee 30 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Time for Womanhattan

But that still has the word man in it

Wopersonhattan

But that has the gender term son in it

Woperchildhattan

[–] executivechimp@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Fun fact, woman and man come from different roots. So while it might have the letters of man in it, it doesn't have man exactly.

[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

That doesn't sound right...

From what I remember "woman" comes from "wifman", which is a compound of "wif" and "man", and back then "man" still refered to male and female persons, and "wer" and "wif" were male and female persons respectively.

[–] executivechimp@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Fun fact: my memory is shitty. Looks like you're right except that "man" wasn't gendered at the time.

[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

except that “man” wasn’t gendered at the time.

But I included that, didn't I?

and back then “man” still refered to male and female persons

Or do you mean rather than male and female, I should have said persons regardless of gender? I guess that makes more sense.

Fun fact: I can't fucking read either.