Asklemmy

43757 readers

2316 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

What do you think the voting age should be? (lemmy.ml)

submitted 1 month ago by hellabryanstyle@lemmy.ml to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

125 comments fedilink hide all child comments

About two years ago now, I was sitting on a bench in Central Park writing my initial thoughts on what I didn't know then but would come to know as Youth Rights.

I don't think I'll ever remember why she did, but about halfway through the day Greta Thunberg came to mind, and I looked up the voting age in Sweden. And my blood boiled in a way I've never experienced in my entire life.

16 years old and one of the most famous and recognizable political activists in the world. 16 years old giving a confident, impassioned, admonishing speech to the fucking UN. 16 years old with no legal right to a voice in her country. No voice to vote for the policies she believed in or the people who might enact them.

My writing, already vitriolic to a fault, managed to become even moreso but with the topic abruptly switched to voting. For the first time in my life, I considered where I'd place the voting age if I could do so unilaterally. Not long into considering it I had a thought that I wrote down immediately, a question I've asked well over 100 times at this point with no substantial answer:

When is it reasonable to say to a person, 'If you're not at least this old, then I don't give a fuck what you think'?

And from the moment I had that thought, I have been unable to place the voting age.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] nonentity@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

From an Australian perspective, my proposal is:

Eligible to vote at 16.
Compulsory voting at 18.
A citizen’s vote has a weight of 100% until 20, then drops 5% at each birthday that ends with a 0.

The reason for the diminishing weight of a vote is to correlate with the diminished exposure political decisions will have on the citizen.

[–] AndyMFK@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Strong agree with your first 2 points, stronger disagree with your last point. Do you seriously think a 40 year old doesn't deserve a vote?

[–] nonentity@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago

Using the formula as written, anyone aged 40-49 would have a vote weighted at 85%. You’d have to make it to 210 years old to reach 0%.

[–] lud@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

Yeah, 5 percent ≠ 5 percent points

[–] polskilumalo@lemmygrad.ml -5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Compulsory voting at 18.

HAHAHAHAHA

A citizen’s vote has a weight of 100% until 20, then drops 5% at each birthday that ends with a 0.

Oh my god you really must think age has more power than capital. Jesus hahahaha

[–] EABOD25@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Why you gotta be like this?

[–] Hadriscus@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

They're probably in a bad percentile