this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2024

197 points (98.5% liked)

196

16246 readers

2827 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

greembow@lemmy.blahaj.zone

moss@lemmy.blahaj.zone

moss@lemmy.world

queue@beehaw.org

funky_rodent@lemmy.blahaj.zone

PeachyMcPeachface@lemmy.blahaj.zone

threegnomes@lemmy.blahaj.zone

greembow@lemmy.world

remotelove@lemmy.ca

Roflmasterbigpimp@feddit.de

qaz@lemmy.world

A_Very_Big_Fan@lemm.ee

qaz@lemmy.blahaj.zone

A_Very_Big_Fan@lemmy.world

qaz@lemmy.dbzer0.com

qaz@sh.itjust.works

qaz@lemmy.sdf.org

197

Acorn rule (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 6 days ago by zarkanian@sh.itjust.works to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone

16 comments fedilink hide all child comments

From The Onion Book of Known Knowledge.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

There's no way, without violating the laws of physics, can you fit any kind of 2.4Ghz modem into something as small as an acorn.

[–] Excrubulent@slrpnk.net 1 points 4 days ago

You can with a sub-wavelength antenna like a nintendo joycon has, it's less than 10mm in X and Y axes. It will just have terrible reception, like a nintendo joycon has.

Also it could be a higher frequency which would allow a smaller antenna.