this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2024
1117 points (97.1% liked)

Steam Deck

14595 readers
1208 users here now

A place to discuss and support all things Steam Deck.

Replacement for r/steamdeck_linux.

As Lemmy doesn't have flairs yet, you can use these prefixes to indicate what type of post you have made, eg:
[Flair] My post title

The following is a list of suggested flairs:
[Discussion] - General discussion.
[Help] - A request for help or support.
[News] - News about the deck.
[PSA] - Sharing important information.
[Game] - News / info about a game on the deck.
[Update] - An update to a previous post.
[Meta] - Discussion about this community.

Some more Steam Deck specific flairs:
[Boot Screen] - Custom boot screens/videos.
[Selling] - If you are selling your deck.

These are not enforced, but they are encouraged.

Rules:

Link to our Matrix Space

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmit.online/post/3922769

This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/linustechtips by /u/RevolutionaryAd8204 on 2024-09-14 15:50:43+00:00.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 13 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (15 children)

That's $346 in USD, if anyone is interested.

[–] xthexder@l.sw0.com 15 points 2 weeks ago (14 children)

That's the 512gb version even. You can get the 64gb version for $296 right now, which is a great deal. Upgrading the SSD later is pretty easy too.

[–] ysjet@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago (12 children)

Not to mention you can just toss a 1tb SD card in, with no skills needed and only minimal cost difference.

Yes, accessing your data off an SD card is marginally slower than off an NVME ssd.... but we're talking, iirc, milliseconds. If it really bugs you later down the line, then you can upgrade the SSD.

[–] InFerNo@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

You think a microSD is only marginally slower than an nvme SSD?

https://www.reddit.com/r/SteamDeck/comments/x0wdd8/disk_benchmarks_results_emmc_vs_nvme_vs_microsdxc/

Found some benchmarks. Load times appear to be influenced by the CPU doing decompression. It's not the SD being as fast as a SSD, but rather the SSD being as slow as a SD because of this. That's... interesting.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 6 points 2 weeks ago

Load times have always been bottlenecked by the CPU, so it's not a massive surprise that the SSD is about on par with a decent SD card.

On the PS4 an SSD was faster than a HDD, but not by a massive amount. At least it was quieter though.

[–] Zoot@reddthat.com 5 points 2 weeks ago

In the steam decks case yeah.

[–] ysjet@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

Yep. At some point maybe Valve will change that, but for now, it's a great way to get a steam deck. And even if they do change/fix that later, you're not really missing out on anything- everything will be the same speed it always was for you.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)