this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2023
195 points (86.5% liked)

Asklemmy

43963 readers
1910 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Yes, I'm the one in the group DM that turns the bubbles green, I'm sorry.

But other than that, I don't hear many other reasons why people actually prefer iPhones over Androids. What other reasons are there?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TheRealKuni@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What’s more, they then gave discounted battery replacements to phones of the most-effected generations. As in, for like $50 or something the phone went back to working essentially like new (and had better battery life again to boot).

If their goal with the battery health throttling was to make money by forcing people to buy new phones, they sure went about it in a weird way. πŸ˜†

[–] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

They only offered that cheap battery replacement after the lawsuit was filed.

Thats not an act of kindness, thats ass covering. They then settled the class action about the secret throttling for $300+ millon.

Not exactly just an "opps, we forget to mention what we were doing for your phones health for years, really guys" situation. In every possible way, they were silently hobbling the performance of old phones, which directly helped their sales of new phones.

The right thing to do was very simple : alert people and offer inexpensive battery replacements. We know it was very simple because they did it immediately when their duplicity was revealed in a court of law. Now ask youself why they didnt do it for years.

[–] bloodfart@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

Iirc they offered battery replacement as part of a settlement, and had an os update out that gave detailed battery health information before that went down and outside of it.