this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2024
33 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37727 readers
602 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Enticing though they are, such arguments conceal a logical flaw. As a classic 19th-century theory known as a Jevons paradox explains, even if autonomous vehicles eventually work perfectly — an enormous “if” — they are likely to increase total emissions and crash deaths, simply because people will use them so much.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] muhyb@programming.dev 6 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Jevons didn't know that autonomous vehicles can work like a hive mind, today it's possible.

[–] t3rmit3@beehaw.org 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Sure, it's possible to make AVs into basically drone swarms that have perfect coordination, the problem is that unless you also kick all human-controlled cars off the road, it's not going to work. Drone swarms don't have human controlled drones, or even drone swarms from other manufacturers, flying through the middle of them, or they would be crashing into each other all the time.

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 2 months ago

Even if you perfectly solve crashes (doubtful, definitely not something that exists right now), the problems of microplastic pollution from tires and emissions from electricity generation are non-trivial.