this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2024
334 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

34415 readers
594 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 70 points 1 week ago (14 children)

The enshitification is progressing nicely!

[–] pup_atlas@pawb.social 57 points 1 week ago (5 children)

I don’t see this as enshittification. It’s a real thing that’s happening, but raw storage is expensive. They pay for it directly. Unlike artificially limiting features that are “free” to them, this genuinely isn’t, it’s not even really super discounted for them on the backend. They’re likely just paying for a series of S3 buckets.

[–] Count042@lemmy.ml 42 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I'm a sys admin/devops engineer, and yes, storage is far more expensive then people realize.

This is the very definition of enshittification.

EDIT: To those downvoting:

Do you actually know what the definition of enshittification is? Apparently not.

Enshittification (alternately, crapification and platform decay) is a pattern in which online products and services decline in quality. Initially, vendors create high-quality offerings to attract users, then they degrade those offerings to better serve business customers, and finally degrade their services to users and business customers to maximize profits for shareholders.

It doesn't matter that the cost of storage is a real thing. They gave things of value away for free to grow their user base and to try and capture network effects. Now that they think they have that they are taking away ( or decreasing ) the free stuff of value they gave away.

The fact that storage has value is literally an important part of enshitification.

It wouldn't be enshitification if they gave away free stuff that wasn't valuable.

[–] tyler@programming.dev 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It’s not enshittification because it literally doesn’t follow the second part of your own definition. Needing to change your offerings because your internal prices increase is normal business. Enshittification literally is from companies offering stuff to entice users and then they realize they have nothing else to offer to businesses, so they remove features in order to sell them to businesses or to increase ads.

[–] pup_atlas@pawb.social 3 points 1 week ago

This was my core point. I don’t consider a business raising prices or gating features as a direct result of those features increasing their cost as “enshittification”. Stickers being paid, custom emojis, etc, that doesn’t cost Discord anything to provide, making that paid is enshittification; But if the feature itself costs the business actual money to provide, does everyone just expect them to eat that cost forever, in a lot of cases for absolutely no revenue from the users?

Calling out businesses for not giving stuff that costs them money away for free just, doesn’t fundamentally make sense to me. Why is it just expected of Discord that they pay to store all your large files? A lot of “freemium” services like GMail recoup some of that money by mining your email for data that it can sell to advertisers, or eating the cost in an attempt to lock you into an ecosystem where you’ll spend money. Storing files on Discord is neither of those things.

Don’t get me wrong, a lot of services are enshittifying, and making their services worse so you spend more money with them— but adjusting your quotas and pricing to reflect your real world cost of business is not that. To frame it as though you are entitled to free compute and resources from companies that don’t owe you anything comes off as just that, entitled. The cloud isn’t free. If you want to use a service, you should pay for it if you can.

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Except not, this is what social media is supposed to do, allow people to upload things to share. They've done perfectly well for all these years on it, it's not some new crazy problem. It's existing functionality they are removing, that's on them.

[–] tyler@programming.dev 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Discord isn’t social media. What is with everyone just referring to every tech company product as “social media”!?

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 week ago

I use discord to keep up with what my friends are doing, look at pictures that they post, etc. We used to use Facebook for the same thing back when it was The Facebook and required a university email address and didn’t have ads. How is that not social media?

[–] pup_atlas@pawb.social 2 points 1 week ago

Discord isn’t a social media. With platforms like facebook, you’re still paying for all your storage, just not with money. There’s ads all over the platform, and all your content is data mined to be sold to advertisers. Discord doesn’t data mine (to my knowledge) OR run ads. Would you prefer a higher limit at the cost of having ads all over the interface? The AWS bill has to get paid somehow, nothing is free.

[–] UberMentch@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

It's not, everyone just loves to use the funny swearing buzzword

[–] Butterpaderp@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

Based on all of the changes discord has made over the past few years, its absolutely enshittification

[–] zaph@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Just like YouTube. They need the ad revenue to keep all those videos saved to their servers. It's only natural you watch a 30 second ad every 10 seconds. It isn't enshittification because it's a real thing that’s happening, and raw storage is expensive. They pay for it directly.

[–] ugo@feddit.it 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I suspect the sarcasm detector of the downvoters might be faulty

[–] zaph@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

Maybe but I'm not adding a /s for them

load more comments (8 replies)