this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2023
287 points (95.3% liked)

Lemmy.world Support

3227 readers
30 users here now

Lemmy.world Support

Welcome to the official Lemmy.world Support community! Post your issues or questions about Lemmy.world here.

This community is for issues related to the Lemmy World instance only. For Lemmy software requests or bug reports, please go to the Lemmy github page.

This community is subject to the rules defined here for lemmy.world.

To open a support ticket Static Badge

You can also DM https://lemmy.world/u/lwreport or email report@lemmy.world (PGP Supported) if you need to reach our directly to the admin team.

Follow us for server news 🐘

Outages 🔥

https://status.lemmy.world/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
ruud@lemmy.world
MrKaplan@lemmy.world
jelloeater85@lemmy.world
lwadmin@lemmy.world
Serinus@lemmy.world
287
To the admins- will lemmy.world block Facebook's Threads or are you open to federating with them in the future? (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by YellowtoOrange@lemmy.world to c/support@lemmy.world
208 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

https://ploum.net/2023-06-23-how-to-kill-decentralised-networks.html

Many of us do not trust Facebook and anything it is associated with or swallows up.

EDIT:

https://techcrunch.com/2023/07/05/adam-mosseri-says-metas-threads-app-wont-have-activitypub-support-at-launch/

"Instagram head Adam Mosseri said "

““Soon, you’ll be able to follow and interact with people on other fediverse platforms, such as Mastodon. They can also find people on Threads using full usernames, such as @mosseri@threads.net.””

“We’re committed to building support for ActivityPub, the protocol behind Mastodon, into this app. We weren’t able to finish it for launch given a number of complications that come along with a decentralized network, but it’s coming,” he said.

“If you’re wondering why this matters, here’s a reason: you may one day end up leaving Threads, or, hopefully not, end up de-platformed. If that ever happens, you should be able to take your audience with you to another server. Being open can enable that.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] YellowtoOrange@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I have nothing against "soccer moms", I just don't want to see endless photos of their kids, which may be ironic since there's shitposting on all social networks. Perhaps we'd be able to ignore those communities, however it'll leak over to other communities.

It seemed to be "fine" when "those" sorts of "regular folk" stuck to facebook for their fix of sharing their lives.

Anyway, this aspect isn't the main point, I'd say - it's that one cannot trust facebook, and if they want to federate, it cannot be good for us.

[–] Maxcoffee@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Personally I don't care about the soccer moms, my main concern is all the problems that come with being a mainstream social media platform. Threads threatens to overwhelm the content being generated with all those problems where your Lemmy feed is just going to represent Instagram etc again. Screw that.

[–] YellowtoOrange@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

That's exactly what I'm talking about when using the generic "soccer moms" - mainstream twitter/facebook posts.

I'm probably confusing myself as I have nothing against "normal people", and want them to discus sthings, and I'm sure there could be a lot of good discussions that could be had with "normal people", though being drowned by mainstream media posts is the main issue, as you say.

[–] ccunning@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think it would be easy enough to unsubscribe to the EndlessMoppets community and only subscribe to communities that curate Moppetless posts.

As far as leaking over goes, I never had a problem with EndlessMoppets leaking into any of the subs I did subscribe to over on Reddit.

And for what it’s worth Lemmy is not encrypted so it would be silly to think Meta isn’t already vacuuming up all this content already.