this post was submitted on 24 May 2024
0 points (NaN% liked)

World News

39011 readers
2664 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3volver@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Fuck that title. No such thing as too many solar panels. The only thing that is bad is how the energy is used or if it's wasted. Free energy should mean algae production which would mean carbon negativity. Negative energy price should mean negative carbon emissions, get on it.

[–] UntitledQuitting@reddthat.com 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Free energy should mean algae production

This is a jump I'm not understanding. Do you mean that energy having no cost would mean that the electricity generated can be used to make algae? Or that it's a byproduct of?

[–] 3volver@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Do you mean that energy having no cost would mean that the electricity generated can be used to make algae?

Yes. Make algae with energy that produces no carbon dioxide = carbon sink.

[–] SpongyAneurism@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

There's just no economic incentive to do so. (yet?)

[–] Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

The economic advantage is that our grandchildren might be able to have an economy if we don't crash and burn this place before we die.