I'm genuinely shocked how much Epic poured into the store and it still lacks so much basic features. Sorting games is still extremely barebones, store is filled with NFT/crypto garbage, the store still looks like a college student's first front-end project, and last time I used the launcher to pick up free games (last year), it was still slow as hell. What were they doing in the past 5 years aside from dropping millions on exclusivity deals?

Epic is going to have to prioritize the store and try some new initiatives while also doubling down on earning pivotal exclusives if it is going to have a chance. I also hope other viable competitors arrive.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] mods_mum@lemmy.today 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

No, you don't need a launcher to run an exe. lol

[+] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works -7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You realize there's more DRM free games on Epic than on Steam even though there's less games overall? If your standard for a good launcher is being able to start the game from a .exe then I've got bad news about Steam...

[–] mods_mum@lemmy.today 5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

What bad news about Steam?

[–] addie@feddit.uk 0 points 2 months ago

Presumably Kecessa is alluding to the fact that, unlike GOG, Steam games open however the developers / publishers want them to. Which is sometimes just a plain exe, sometimes it's an exe that starts Steam so that it can use its API / DRM, sometimes it opens the publisher's launcher, and so on. Bit irritating on Linux when you want to pass some options in to the command, and a bit irritating generally when you never want to see the launcher again, but it's no disaster.