this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2024
377 points (97.7% liked)

Technology

58108 readers
4829 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 7 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (4 children)

My understanding is that they're not illegal in so much as they would have to be proven to actually work. Since no one's ever been able to do this to the satisfaction of the regulators effectively self-driving cars are illegal.

We have Tesla's on the road anyway, so I don't quite understand how that works.

They are only effectively illegal right up until they're not. If a company came up with a genuinely self-driving vehicle my understanding is that it would be authorized but they would have to actually demonstrate it, and that's possibly more than the corporations really want to take on at the moment.

Presumably being second to market is the more cost-effective option so everyone's holding off until someone does it first.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

We have Tesla’s on the road anyway, so I don’t quite understand how that works.

The feature marketed as “Full Self-Drivinng” is qualified as a beta feature undergoing test and that it requires a human to be in control at all times. It also makes at least some effort to ensure a human actually is paying attention.

You could certainly quibble that maybe it’s not obvious to all, but it is there.

Also I believe the human sensing was much easier to trick until last fall. But if you have to go out of your way to trick it, how can you claim you didn’t know it wanted a human in control?

[–] JustAnotherKay@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

That makes sense. The VW I'm thinking of may have been level 3 (trying to remember autonomous driving levels off the top of my head so don't quote me on this), as I believe it needed guidance from on-road infrastructure to double check safety issues, which would have obviously been too much hassle for the US.

The proof of concept was miles ahead of Tesla has ever been, though, so it's unfortunate that we can't be bothered to add some sensors to the road

[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Top end Mercedes are lvl 3.

[–] GamingChairModel@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

They are only effectively illegal right up until they're not.

Well for Level 4, installation of human-controllable steering wheels and pedals are optional, and there isn't a system for demanding the human take over at any given time. So in a sense, a street-legal level 4 car will need to be certified before it takes the road, because it simply won't necessarily have functionality that even gives a human the opportunity to drive.