this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2024
223 points (97.4% liked)

World News

39005 readers
1646 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] einkorn@feddit.org 6 points 2 months ago (3 children)

This doesn't answer my question.

In the current situation, Trump has no influence on decision-making in regard to Ukraine. Until he is possibly elected president, he is just an unnecessary security risk.

[–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Because Trump would spill the plan to Putin. He's already handed over documents regarding the US agents working in and around Russia, several of who "mysteriously" got caught not long after. He's definitely a security risk.

[–] einkorn@feddit.org 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Neither does your response answer my question.

I asked why Zelenskyy SHOULD talk to Trump, not for reasons against it.

[–] null@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 months ago

Okay, I'll answer. He shouldn't talk to Trump.

Not sure why you're so fixated on getting an answer to that question, but I hope that helps.

[–] volkerwirsing@feddit.org 1 points 2 months ago

This just shows how Trump completely destroyed normal politics. It does make sense for a country in Ukraines situation to talk to both parties and to get both parties on board. Then the plan could move along regardless of who wins the election in Nov. This would have been possible in the past, with George W. Bush, Obama, Clinton & all other presidents and was actually done for other conflicts and topics in the past. Trump... is special.