Games

16651 readers

591 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
No humor/memes etc..
No affiliate links
No advertising.
No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
No self promotion.
No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
No politics.

Comments.

No personal attacks.
Obey instance rules.
No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works

115

Dev of slept-on tactical RPG says it "sold badly" despite glowing reviews: "My next project will be more focused on 'Does this sell'" (www.gamesradar.com)

submitted 2 months ago by nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works to c/games@sh.itjust.works

48 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It's an anomaly for a game's prospects to get better after the first week than how it does right when it launches. If you want to say it's a failure of marketing, sure, but the time to correct that marketing problem, in more than 99% of cases, was before it launched. There's another comment here that says that looking at it after reading the article, they still don't want to buy it. And for some reason I can't put my finger on, I'm right there with them.

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 4 points 2 months ago

They should have advertised the game before it was released, plain amd simple. Personally I don't like how they're whining about it, that turns me off of the game.