this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2023
3413 points (96.1% liked)

Fediverse

28480 readers
725 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I strongly encourage instance admins to defederate from Facebook/Threads/Meta.

They aren't some new, bright-eyed group with no track record. They're a borderline Machiavellian megacorporation with a long and continuing history of extremely hostile actions:

  • Helping enhance genocides in countries
  • Openly and willingly taking part in political manipulation (see Cambridge Analytica)
  • Actively have campaigned against net neutrality and attempted to make "facebook" most of the internet for members of countries with weaker internet infra - directly contributing to their amplification of genocide (see the genocide link for info)
  • Using their users as non-consenting subjects to psychological experiments.
  • Absolutely ludicrous invasions of privacy - even if they aren't able to do this directly to the Fediverse, it illustrates their attitude.
  • Even now, they're on-record of attempting to get instance admins to do backdoor discussions and sign NDAs.

Yes, I know one of the Mastodon folks have said they're not worried. Frankly, I think they're being laughably naive >.<. Facebook/Meta - and Instagram's CEO - might say pretty words - but words are cheap and from a known-hostile entity like Meta/Facebook they are almost certainly just a manipulation strategy.

In my view, they should be discarded as entirely irrelevant, or viewed as deliberate lies, given their continued atrocious behaviour and open manipulation of vast swathes of the population.

Facebook have large amounts of experience on how to attack and astroturf social media communities - hell I would be very unsurprised if they are already doing it, but it's difficult to say without solid evidence ^.^

Why should we believe anything they say, ever? Why should we believe they aren't just trying to destroy a competitor before it gets going properly, or worse, turn it into yet another arm of their sprawling network of services, via Embrace, Extend, Extinguish - or perhaps Embrace, Extend, Consume would be a better term in this case?

When will we ever learn that openly-manipulative, openly-assimilationist corporations need to be shoved out before they can gain any foothold and subsume our network and relegate it to the annals of history?

I've seen plenty of arguments claiming that it's "anti-open-source" to defederate, or that it means we aren't "resilient", which is wrong ^.^:

  • Open source isn't about blindly trusting every organisation that participates in a network, especially not one which is known-hostile. Threads can start their own ActivityPub network if they really want or implement the protocol for themselves. It doesn't mean we lose the right to kick them out of most - or all - of our instances ^.^.
  • Defederation is part of how the fediverse is resilient. It is the immune system of the network against hostile actors (it can be used in other ways, too, of course). Facebook, I think, is a textbook example of a hostile actor, and has such an unimaginably bad record that anything they say should be treated as a form of manipulation.

Edit 1 - Some More Arguments

In this thread, I've seen some more arguments about Meta/FB federation:

  • Defederation doesn't stop them from receiving our public content:
    • This is true, but very incomplete. The content you post is public, but what Meta/Facebook is really after is having their users interact with content. Defederation prevents this.
  • Federation will attract more users:
    • Only if Threads makes it trivial to move/make accounts on other instances, and makes the fact it's a federation clear to the users, and doesn't end up hosting most communities by sheer mass or outright manipulation.
    • Given that Threads as a platform is not open source - you can't host your own "Threads Server" instance - and presumably their app only works with the Threads Server that they run - this is very unlikely. Unless they also make Threads a Mastodon/Calckey/KBin/etc. client.
    • Therefore, their app is probably intending to make itself their user's primary interaction method for the Fediverse, while also making sure that any attempt to migrate off is met with unfamiliar interfaces because no-one else can host a server that can interface with it.
    • Ergo, they want to strongly incentivize people to stay within their walled garden version of the Fediverse by ensuring the rest remains unfamiliar - breaking the momentum of the current movement towards it. ^.^
  • We just need to create "better" front ends:
    • This is a good long-term strategy, because of the cycle of enshittification.
    • Facebook/Meta has far more resources than us to improve the "slickness" of their clients at this time. Until the fediverse grows more, and while they aren't yet under immediate pressure to make their app profitable via enshittification and advertising, we won't manage >.<
    • This also assumes that Facebook/Meta won't engage in efforts to make this harder e.g. Embrace, Extend, Extinguish/Consume, or social manipulation attempts.
    • Therefore we should defederate and still keep working on making improvements. This strategy of "better clients" is only viable in combination with defederation.

PART 2 (post got too long!)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 333 points 1 year ago (9 children)

Defed every corporation. McDonald's starts an instance? Fuck off and fix your ice cream machine. Gabe Newell starts a Steam instance? No Gabe, go make half life 3. Make all these suits federate each other and see if anyone wants to talk on their shit.

[–] sapient_cogbag@infosec.pub 203 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Meta in particular has a specific record of social manipulation, which is why I think defederating them specifically is so important. Even if we collectively have mixed feelings on corporate instances in general, social media companies, especially those like Facebook, have a specific and direct record of manipulating people and the population nya. Facebook/Meta in particular, is probably the worst of any of them.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 94 points 1 year ago

Meta might be the worst possible company to darken our doorstep; at least Elon would fail.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yes, reputation is very important. The cluster of people known as Meta has proven it is nefarious at best.

It's good to consider the case-by-case basis instead of just making general rules.

Like if Lowes wanted to make an instance I wouldn't worry much about its corporate influence. But Meta is actually an evil organization.

(Though their React docs are some of the best docs I've ever read)

[–] platypus_plumba@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

It's strange how Mastodon is so willingly letting them in. Fishy... Fishy and hairy. Like a fish with some nice bangs. Maybe a mullet. A little mustache too, recently brushed with a little mustache brush.

[–] kratoz29@lemmy.world 66 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No Gabe, go make half life 3.

This make me chuckle.

[–] Bushwhack@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

I mean, they aren’t fucking wrong. Half life 3 has a federated communication system built into multiplayer? Go do it Gabe.

[–] FarLine99@lemm.ee 28 points 1 year ago

Defederation is the only way. Freedom. Fediverse. Only forward!

[–] zos_kia@lemmy.fmhy.ml 16 points 1 year ago

I'm right there with you. I can already foresee that their apps will be prioritizing monetized users like content creators and everything in there will be a transaction of some sort. Who cares, you just have to block their instances and go about your merry way.

[–] EyesEyesBaby@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I've never had any problems at McDonald's with their ice cream / milkshake machines in Europe. Maybe the US simply gets the faulty machines?

[–] Ilikecheese@vlemmy.net 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It’s a pretty well established anecdote that most of the time a McDonalds tells you the ice cream machine is broken, it’s because they’ve already cleaned it for the night and if they use it again they’ll need to reclean it. It’s easier to say it’s broken rather than make one dessert and then have to reclean it all over again.

[–] danielton@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Bullshit. I know everybody loves a good "lazy employees" story, but American machines are designed to break down constantly so Taylor gets repair revenue from McDonald's franchise owners.

I used to work at McDonald's and got tired of the constant accusations from customers. Johnny Harris made an excellent video on this topic.

I know a good number of McDonald's employees are lazy, but that damn machine was the bane of my existence when I was a manager. It would just randomly decide not to work for the day and we had to call Taylor.

[–] Ilikecheese@vlemmy.net 3 points 1 year ago

To be fair, I did say “well established anecdote” and not “well established fact”.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)

You're not getting the real McDonalds experience

[–] benji@aussie.zone 7 points 1 year ago

There’s heaps of vids on yt about the MacDonald’s ice cream machine racket.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=SrDEtSlqJC4

[–] boeman@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

The company that maintains the machines has a contractually enforced monopoly over the franchisee's. This means it's impossible to get parts or fix the machines outside of them doing it.

[–] GatoB@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] YarRe@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (19 children)

It's a giant drm manager. Popular, useful, sure, but the day it dies all your content will go poof.

load more comments (19 replies)
[–] ilikekeyboards@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Right now we're losing tons of information after snapchat bought and deleted the gyffcaf website.

Now imagine losing all games when Gabe dies and the new patron loses the company to a newfound addiction to whatever

[–] DarkMatter_contract@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I dont think mastodon would, but i think lemmy kbin would. The target audience is different, one is twitter and the other is reddit like. I dont think twitter user hate fb as much as we do.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

They always did strike me as idiots

[–] xaxl@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Idiots maybe but probably wealthy idiots once Meta is done with them.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SulaymanF@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I have no love for corporations but they’re a fact of life by this point on the internet. They drive a significant about of marketing and users and they’re what make a social media platform take off (which is why Parler and Gab fell apart).

Fediverse SHOULD be an ethical platform, but you have server admins defederating any instance that even has paid subscribers. Isn’t that going too far? Are we trying to force everyone on here into a kibbutz?

[–] TechnoBabble@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I believe the only instances that should be defederated are corporate, self-harm, profanely illegal, and political extremist instances.

Anything further than that and the whole network is going to devolve into a series of micro echo chambers.

Or maybe it won't, maybe the vast and free instances will flourish while the restrictive instances die out.

Either way, trying to control a community based on wishy washy ideology is not a good look.

I think in these early days we'll see a lot of power drunk admins who are too eager to push the button, just because they can.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Arcenus@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Agree.

But isn't half life alyx basically hl3?

[–] FranklinsBeard@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nah, that's a prequel. What everyone wants is a conclusion to the cliffhanger that the current Half-Life story ended on. Good game though!

[–] grue@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

We need Half-Life 2: Episode 3, and then Half-Life 3.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (16 children)

VR will remain a gimmick until it isn't a whole-ass lifestyle.

[–] Molecular0079@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

But...it doesn't have to be a whole-ass lifestyle, even right now with the current state of VR. Even with an Oculus Quest 2, you just put on the headset, play an hour or so, and then put the headset down like a normal person.

The marketing teams at Meta and Apple want to market it as a lifestyle because that's the only way they know how to promote it without going into the nerdy weeds of VR game design, etc., but from a consumer perspective, it's only a lifestyle if you choose to make it your lifestyle.

load more comments (15 replies)