this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2023
1472 points (97.8% liked)

World News

38987 readers
2254 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The world has experienced its hottest day on record, according to meteorologists.

The average global temperature reached 17.01C (62.62F) on Monday, according to the US National Centres for Environmental Prediction.

The figure surpasses the previous record of 16.92C (62.46F) - set back in August 2016.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Sparlock@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

So many logical jumps here.

"WW3" ? wtf..

"narrative" that wasn't mentioned.

The "whole economy" that also was not mentioned.

Try responding to the comment as written, not the voices in your head and it might appear more coherent to others.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee -5 points 1 year ago (1 children)
  • WW3: Russia has invaded Ukraine. Multiple countries are providing arms to the two sides.
  • narrative: The comment before mine contained that narrative. If you can’t see it there I can’t help you see it.
  • whole economy: what the poster referred to as “working from home” was actually “lockdown”. It was lockdown that cleared the pollution from the air. For some people it was working from home; for others it was being forcibly removed from their job
[–] Sparlock@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Your echo chamber is showing in how much you read into things. Wow.

Life Pro Tip for ya: Try engaging with the words on the screen as written not the voices in your head and your feed.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Here is how I interpreted those comments:

We need some harsh mandates. Look at what Work From Home did for wildlife and emmisions in a short amount of time.

"During the height of the pandemic, the air got substantially better as a result of people not traveling (lockdowns)”

We need that style of change. Big, bold, and life altering.

“We need to be willing to disrupt people’s lives like we did during pandemic response (lockdowns)”

But what about the feelings of rich people? They might not like that!

“Those disruptions’ negative effects would be felt by rich people, but I don’t care about their narrow needs compared to the needs of all humanity”

If you disagree with my interpretation, what is your interpretation (in your own words) of what was being said?

[–] Sparlock@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'd be happy to explain what they said. But you need to explain the extra leaps of logic you used to get where you did.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I've answered some of your questions. It's your turn because this conversation is unfair if I'm putting in 10x more effort than you.

[–] Sparlock@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nah. You made all the wild claims. You don't get to shift the burden when someone calls you on your bullshit.

If you won't, or can't, that's fine. I'll just assume you were full of shit all along and everyone else that reads this will be justified in doing the same.

TLDR; put up or shut up.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you won't, or can't, that's fine. I'll just assume you were full of shit all along

Yeah that's basically my point. I was trying to be polite with the asking for some effort on you part too, but really what I'm getting at is that you can't provide those answers because you know the moment you enter an honest discussion you might have to step out of the inquisitor role which you obviously enjoy.

You win. I lose. Good night.

[–] Sparlock@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

So you won't explain yourself and try to call me the asshole for asking you to back up your claims.

Gotcha.

You can, with all due respect, fuck off now.