this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2024
1255 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

59674 readers
3223 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] faethon@lemmy.world 49 points 3 months ago (6 children)

At this point I am seriously wondering why people would like to use Chrome over Firefox for instance.

[–] CynicusRex@lemmy.ml 10 points 3 months ago

“What's a browser?” —the general populace

I just install uBlock Origin on every device I come across. Graffiti software.

[–] rooster_butt@lemm.ee 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Because I use chrome for standard use and Firefox for sailing the high seas. And I much prefer just having 2 separate browsers for containerization. I'm just going to have to use librewolf or something when I do get the the mv3 update.

[–] PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Why not just use something like Fences on Firefox? It allows you to containerize individual tabs. I use it all the time to separate work and personal accounts.

[–] faethon@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

This is also how I have it set up, with "firefox multi-account containers" and "simple tab groups" working together, you can have multiple containerized accounts within one firefox instance. Works great!

[–] rooster_butt@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Does this allow you enable/disable add-ons on a per container basis? What about bookmarks?

[–] RangerJosie@sffa.community 4 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Use chrome to download Firefox.

[–] kungen@feddit.nu 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

That's Edge's job. Though I guess they're basically the same thing...

[–] RangerJosie@sffa.community 1 points 3 months ago

Equally fkin useless.

I wish I had a 1.0 version of netscape saved somewhere so I could use it.

[–] ruabmbua@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Back in the day when I still used windows, I did not even use IE to download Firefox. I used the FTP functionality inside the explorer to download Firefox from the Mozilla FTP.

[–] ColdWater@lemmy.ca 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I didn't even need a browser to download another browser, I just git clone it from the AUR :P

[–] mrvictory1@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

Just curl it from Mozilla, they provide an archive file that's distro agnostic.

[–] miridius@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

Personal preference I guess. I've tried Firefox many times over the years and always ended up going back to other browsers. I find Firefox doesn't render some pages quite right, the user agent stylesheet is odd, and the UI is less streamlined. Performance also used to be a problem although I hear it's caught up now.

I used to be a Chrome user but now I prefer chromium based alternatives like brave and edge (which incidentally, uBO will keep working on). Chrome is still required for work, but uBO change won't be an issue I think, there are plenty of other ad blockers that will work with MV3

[–] Prethoryn@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I am using Firefox as of last week I made the switch to the browser a different password manager and so far it is fine but there have been a couple of hiccups but it's not necessarily a Firefox issue but an implementation with Android issue.

For example auto forwarding to an app from a webpage in Firefox has worked half the time for me and the other half not so much.

This is a small example, having Google Chrome and like wise the Google app be native to Android so they move back and forth between one another and are interchangeable while using my phone is much more smooth on my Android device.

Other than that, I am not positive as to why. On Desktop, zero issues. Works like a charm.

[–] ocassionallyaduck@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

Its cool well just message the maintainers of Android to improve it, I'm sure it's a mistake. Lemme go check who who's behind it... /s

[–] TheBloodFarts@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Being able to cast seamlessly from Chrome to Chromecast is the only major issue I've had since switching to Firefox. It's possible with Firefox and it works 99% of the time but it feels a little clunky. Completely worth it though overall and not a dealbreaker

[–] mrvictory1@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

How do you cast from Firefox?

[–] TheBloodFarts@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 months ago

Search up the fx_cast extension

[–] mipadaitu@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (4 children)

I use multiple profiles in chrome for my different logged in usages, for some reason Firefox makes it hard to switch profiles.

[–] LiamMayfair@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 3 months ago

Look up the Firefox Containers extension.

[–] palordrolap@fedia.io 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

"Hard" is a strong word. It's not built into the default interface, granted, but it's not that hard to use FF's command line: firefox -P

They have said they're thinking about rejigging the whole thing though.

[–] mipadaitu@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Ok, telling people to open a command line and TYPE firefox -P is HARD. In chrome you just click the icon in the upper right and select whatever profile you want.

It makes no sense that you have to either open about:profiles then select "launch in new window" or open the command line to start a new profile, makes NO sense at all.

You can open a firefox private window with a keyboard shortcut, but if you want to be logged into two different accounts in two different profiles, you have to go through a minimum of three non-intuitive steps.

Even the extension that adds the profile switching doesn't work anymore because it's not maintained.

[–] palordrolap@fedia.io -3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Dude, if that's all-caps HARD, then I don't know how you'd classify, say, compiling things from source and fixing any problems that might crop up along the way. Or fixing missing DLL / OCX hell when trying to get an old Windows game running under Linux, because let me tell you, I've done both of those and had to give up. firefox -P is heaven by comparison.

You could even put it into a shortcut and you wouldn't have to type it any more.

Yes the interface sucks, but HARD is not it.

[–] Bongles@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Sure, but you know most people do not have to do what you just described.

[–] palordrolap@fedia.io 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Most people don't need multiple profiles either.

[–] Bongles@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago
[–] minstrel@lemmy.eco.br 1 points 3 months ago

it has something like '-no-remote -p name' param on cmd that you can do it seamless like chromium, or u can use the fork of the drop official pwa firefox support, it could be better, i know n i get it, but if u just use chromium base for it, than i got u covered

[–] DarkThoughts@fedia.io 1 points 3 months ago

The profile manager is definitely annoying, but it shouldn't be that hard to visit about:profiles to switch / open other profiles. Afaik they do work on a better one though.